abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Article

9 Oct 2014

Author:
Yousuf Aftab, Enodo Rights (USA)

Lawyer analyses how UN Guiding Principles impact CSR risks & strategy of extractive companies

"The intersection of law and corporate social responsibility: Human rights strategy and litigation readiness for extractive-sector companies", Oct 2014

...The Guiding Principles fundamentally restructure CSR as a legal discipline. They do not, of course, eliminate the need for stakeholder engagement or public relations strategy. But even when pursuing these ends, extractive-sector companies need to do so in a systematic way informed by legal
concepts and potential legal risks...CSR strategy and reporting will bear on director and officer liability, third-party reliance claims, unfair competitive practices claims, and contract liability...[I]t is essential for the extractive sector to treat CSR seriously as a strategic legal exercise, not an unstructured communications sub-discipline. To return to Friedman’s quotation: the rules of the game have changed, and CSR is no longer an auxiliary social responsibility—it is a business imperative...