abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Article

22 Mar 2007

Author:
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)

[PDF] Human rights, alternative dispute resolution and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises

Briefing note for the participants at the Workshop on Accountability and Dispute Resolution...being organised by John Ruggie and Jane Nelson of Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government...The goal of the Workshop is “to devise and make recommendations for an effective dispute resolution mechanism that offers viable and legitimate outcomes for those with grievances, as well as for corporations.” This briefing note aims to inform the Workshop’s participants as to how one such dispute resolution mechanism – the “specific instances” facility available under the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises – has been used to look at various concrete questions regarding business and human rights in particular investment situations...[refers to Aker Kvaerner, Atlas Copco, Electricité de France (ESF), GSL Australia [part of GSL], Marine Harvest, Sandvik, Visteon]