abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Article

1 Jun 2011

Author:
Institute for Human Rights and Business & Echo Research

[PDF] Institute for Human Rights & Business Survey on Corporate Human Rights Preparedness

In order to assess the perspectives of business leaders on business and human rights as part of their companies’ role in society, the IHRB has conducted a first global survey…The…survey was…completed by 97 people including directors of global communications and CEOs…[findings include that:] Over half of the respondents are aware of the growing numbers of claims of human rights abuse against business…Maintaining a good reputation is felt to be the prime motive for businesses in attending to human rights…Only a quarter know the UN framework “Protect, Respect, Remedy” very well. Most…rate the risk to their organisation from human rights issues as low…33%...say their organisation has no formal policy on human rights…Only a third…measure the impact of their business on human rights…The biggest stumbling block to embedding human rights is likely to be incomprehension among key managers. [refers to AngloGold Ashanti, Apple, Asahi Kosei, Barrick Gold, Boeing, BP, Chiquita, Google, Lundbeck, Maersk (part of A.P. Moller - Maersk), Monsanto, News International (part of News Corp), Nike, Novartis, Prada, Primark (part of Associated British Foods), Ramboll, Roche, Shell, Southwest Airlines, Statoil, Unilever, Vodafone]