abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

هذه الصفحة غير متوفرة باللغة العربية وهي معروضة باللغة English

الدعوى القضائية

14 أكتوبر 2015

Shell lawsuit (re oil spills & Ogale & Bille communities in Nigeria - Okpabi v Shell)

الحالة: ONGOING

Date lawsuit was filed
14 أكتوبر 2015
دقة التاريخ
السنة صحيحة
غير معروف
مجتمع
موقع رفع الدعوى: المملكة المتحدة
موقع الحادثة: نيجيريا
نوع التقاضي: مشتركة بين البلدان

الشركات

Shell plc المملكة المتحدة النفط والغاز والفحم
Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria (SPDC) نيجيريا النفط والغاز والفحم

المصادر

Snapshot

In 2015, the Ogale and Bille Nigerian communities respectively filed claims against the UK Company Royal Dutch Shell in UK High Court. Plaintiffs consist of 42,500 residents of Nigeria who seek remedy for extensive oil pollution which affected their livelihoods and the environment. The case is ongoing.

Factual background

On 14 October and 22 December 2015, the Ogale and Bille Nigerian communities respectively filed claims against the UK company Royal Dutch Shell plc (hereinafter Shell) and its Nigerian subsidiary Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) in the UK High Court. Both claims were brought by law firm Leigh Day on behalf of around 42,500 residents and citizens of Nigeria who seek remedy for extensive oil pollution which considerably affected their livelihoods and the environment.

Legal argument

The claimants argue that Shell failed to adequately prevent oil spills and subsequently to conduct proper clean-up in order to avoid serious contamination of agricultural lands and waterways. 

Legal proceedings

On 2 March 2016, the Technology and Construction Court gave permission to the claimants to sue Shell in England, and ruled that formal legal proceedings could proceed to the next stage in the London High Court. The company challenged both communities’ lawsuits, arguing that pipeline sabotage and illegal refining had been the main sources of pollution across the Niger Delta, and that the cases should be heard in Nigeria instead of the UK. 

On 26 January 2017, the High Court held that the communities could not seek redress against Shell in English courts. The Judge concluded that there was not sufficient evidence that Shell exercised a high degree of oversight, control or direction over SPDC, and therefore that the parent company had no legal responsibility for pollution by its Nigerian subsidiary. The claimants appealed this decision, arguing that the Judge reached this conclusion before disclosure of relevant documents or hearing witnesses about the relationship between Shell and SPDC. 

On 14 February 2018, the Court of Appeal upheld the High Court’s ruling, with a majority of judges holding that the parent company did not hold a duty of care towards affected communities. 

Following the dismissal, the claimants announced their intention to bring the case to the UK Supreme Court. On 27 April 2018, over 40 UK and international human rights, development and environmental NGOs submitted a letter to the Supreme Court supporting the claimants’ application to appeal. They asserted that the Appeal Court’s judgment could greatly limit access to justice for people harmed by UK companies’ international operations. On 9 July 2018, the Supreme Court announced that the Appeal Panel had decided to defer consideration of the claimants’ application to appeal until judgment is given in a similar parent company liability case being examined at the Supreme Court, namely Vedanta Resources PLC and another (Appellants) v Lungowe and others (Respondents).

In May 2019, civil society organizations asked the UK Supreme Court to allow the fishing communities to appeal against the 2017 ruling saying that Shell did not hold a duty of care towards affected communities. In July 2019, the UK Supreme Court granted permission to appeal.

On 12 May 2020, claimants filed an appeal with the UK Supreme Court. They argue that Royal Dutch Shell owes them a common law duty of care in respect to the extensive environmental harmed caused by their business operations in Nigeria. Further, they note denying claimants the opportunity to have these claims tried on their merits would cause a grave injustice to the communities harmed by Shell's operations. The International Commission of Jurists, The Corporate Responsibility Coalition Limited, and Corner House Research submitted written requests to the Supreme Court to intervene in the case.

On 12 February 2021, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal and ruled that the case against Royal Dutch Shell and its Nigerian subsidiary can proceed in the UK courts. Notably, the Court's decision determines that there is a good arguable case that Shell is legally responsible for the systemic pollution affecting the Ogale and Bille communities.

In July 2021, it was revealed that Shell did not contest the English courts' jurisdiction, and that its Nigerian subsidiary, SPDC will be joined to the claims.

On 27 January 2023, over 11 000 people and 17 institutions from Ogale, Nigeria joined over 2 000 people from the Bille community in their individual claims that seek compensation for individual loss of livelihoods due to the ongoing water pollution and health impact. These individual claims are in addition to the 2015 claims by both communities about the clean-up and remediation.The High Court held a multi-day hearing on, among other things, Shell's legal liability.

In November 2023, the High Court ruled that the individuals' claims of human rights abuses could proceed in the UK justice system. The judge found it was arguable that oil pollution violated the individuals' legally protected rights to a clean and healthy environment. Shell claims it has no legal responsibility for the pollution, asserting the blame falls on its subsidiary, the Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria (SPDC). In response to the ruling, a Shell spokesperson said “We strongly believe in the merits of our case. Oil is being stolen on an industrial scale in the Niger delta. This criminality is a major source of pollution and is the cause of the majority of spills in the Bille and Ogale claims."

In March 2024, the High Court ruled that the claims should be treated as a "global claim", i.e. that each of the claimants should "prove that Shell was responsible for all the pollution that has impacted their environment. If there were any other sources of pollution for which Shell was not responsible, the entire claim would fail."

On 11 October 2024, the Court of Appeal granted a landmark appeal for the Ogale and Bille communities, allowing their claims to proceed to a full trial. This decision overturns a previous ruling that would have severely limited the communities' ability to seek justice for the alleged extensive pollution caused by Shell's operations.

News

-Oil Spillage: Two Nigerian communities secure major legal victory against Shell in UK, Premium Times, 13 October 2024

- Court of Appeal rules in favour of Nigerian communities over alleged pollution by oil giant Shell in a ruling of major significance for future environmental claims, Leigh Day, 11 October 2024

-Court of Appeal hears Shell Nigeria oil spill appeal which will have major implications for future environmental claims, Leigh Day, 8 October 2024

-"Nigerian villagers can bring human rights claims against Shell over oil pollution in the Niger Delta in the UK, High Court rules", Leigh Day, 23 Nov 2023

-"Shell to face human rights claims in UK over chronic oil pollution in Niger delta", The Guardian, 23 Nov 2023

-"Niger Delta communities back in High Court to fight Shell’s further attempt to delay legal case", Leigh Day, 24 Jul 2023

-"Nearly 14,000 Nigerians take Shell to court over devastating impact of pollution", Sandra Laville, Guardian (UK), 2 Feb 2023

-"Shell abandons push for oil spill case to be heard in Nigeria, Bloomberg", 12 Jul 2021

- "Shell in Nigeria: Polluted communities 'can sue in English courts'", BBC News, 13 Feb 2021
- "Supreme Court rules that polluted Nigerian communities can sue Royal Dutch Shell in the English courts", Leigh Day, 12 Feb 2021
- "UK Supreme Court to hear Nigerians' case for pursuing Shell spill claim in England", 24 July 2019
"Nigerian fishermen fight for permission to appeal oil pollution ruling", The Times (UK), 30 April 2018
"Appeal court rules Nigerians cannot pursue Shell spill claim in England", Reuters, 14 February 2018
"Court of Appeal to hear Nigerian villagers' pollution claims against Shell", Leigh Day, 21 November 2017
"UK court hears appeal in Shell Nigeria oil spill case", Al Jazeera (Qatar), 21 November 2017
"Shell battles Nigerian communities in high-stakes London lawsuit", Reuters, 6 January 2017
"Shell Fights Lawsuits Over Environmental Record in Nigeria", Morning Star Advisor, 19 November 2016
“40,000 Nigerians take Shell to UK court over oil spills", Nigeria Today, 16 November 2016
- “Two new legal actions launched against Shell over Nigerian oil pollution”, Leigh Day, 1 March 2016

NGO Statements

-New UK legal case on Niger Delta oil spills – a litmus test for justice in the energy transition, SOMO, 2 Feb 2023

- Nigeria: Shell must clean up devastating oil spills in the Niger Delta, Amnesty International, 2 Feb 2023

- "CORE and ICJ welcome landmark UK Supreme Court decision - Nigerian claimants can pursue environmental devastation allegations against Shell in UK courts", CORE & the International Commission of Jurists, 12 Feb 2021
“Seeking justice: the rising tide of court cases against Shell”, Amnesty International, May 2018
Court of Appeal Decisions Threatens to Close Route to Justice, CORE Coalition (UK), 1 May 2018
UK Supreme Court should allow 40.000 Nigerian villagers appeal a ruling that leaves victims of Shell's oil spills without remedy, civil society demands, European Coalition for Corporate Justice, 30 April 2018
"UK Court of Appeal Rules Royal Dutch Shell Not Liable for Nigeria Oil Spills", CORE Coalition, 15 February 2018
"UK: Shell ruling could give green light to corporations for abuses abroad", Amnesty International, 23 January 2017

Legal Documents

UK Supreme court judgment, 12 Feb 2021

Appelant's Appeal to the Supreme Court in Okapbi & others v. Royal Dutch Shell PLC and others, 12 May 2020

Rule 26 submission to the UK Supreme Court by Corner House Research, May 2020

Rule 26 submission to the UK Supreme Court by CORE & ICJ to intervene, May 2020

Rule 15 submission to the Supreme Court of the UK by CORE Coalition & Others on behalf of Okpabi et al. v Royal Dutch Shell, CORE, 27 April 2018 

Okpabi and Others v Royal Dutch Shell PLC and Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria LTD and Alame and others v Royal Dutch Shell PLC and Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria LTD, Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 14 February 2018

Okpabi and Others v Royal Dutch Shell PLC and Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria LTD, High Court of Justice Queen’s Bench Division, 26 January 2017

الجدول الزمني