abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

Diese Seite ist nicht auf Deutsch verfügbar und wird angezeigt auf English

NGO-Erwiderung

23 Aug 2024

Autor:
Concerned Citizens of Mossville et al.

Rejoinder to Sasol's response to Mossville Update

"CCOM disagrees with Sasol’s characterization of the recent engagement. For generations, Mossville residents have witnessed, firsthand, Sasol’s systematic obliteration of our community, which was once beautiful, thriving and self-sufficient, into an unrecognizable remnant of total desolation.

Mossville residents’ properties sit literally right next door to Sasol, with only a fence or road separating them as Sasol emits ethylene oxide and other dangerous pollutants.  If Sasol was serious about investing in research and product stewardship technologies to protect the health of our community, then we suggest that Sasol use those investment monies to pay Mossville residents for relocation." 

Zeitleiste