abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Article

1 Feb 2017

Author:
Tory Newmyer, David Morris, Madeline Farber & Lucinda Shen, Fortune (USA)

Fortune 100 companies respond to Trump's travel ban

“23 Huge Companies That Have Responded to President Trump’s Immigration Ban”, 31 January 2017

When President Donald Trump signed an executive order to bar immigrants from seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the U.S., the ban promised to have far-reaching consequences for businesses and employees. After all, several of the country's largest businesses were made possible by immigrants—including Apple, Amazon, Google, and Yahoo. In the aftermath of the ban, we contacted the majority of the Fortune 100 for comment. Below are the responses to the ban we gathered from some of the country's largest global employers, in addition to public comments made by the companies. This list will be updated as more companies respond to requests…

[Includes responses from 21st Century Fox, Amazon, American Express, Apple, Bank of America, Cisco Systems, Citigroup, Coca-Cola, FedEx, Ford, General Electric, General Motors, Goldman Sachs, Google, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, IBM, J.P. Morgan, Merck, Microsoft, Morgan Stanley, Nike, Procter & Gamble, Wells Fargo]

Timeline