abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Story

11 Oct 2016

Fossil fuel firms respond to petition before Philippines Human Rights Commission on human rights & climate impacts

Greenpeace, disaster survivors, and community organisations from the Philippines submitted a complaint to the Commission on Human Rights of the Philippines (CHR) against 47 large fossil fuel and cement companies over their role in "human-induced climate change" that "interferes with the enjoyment of Filipinos' fundamental rights." In July 2016, CHR sent the complaint to the oil, coal, mining and cement companies, and asked them to respond to the allegations. 

Business & Human Rights Resource Centre invited the following companies to publicly share their responses:

  • Alpha Natural Resources
  • Anadarko
  • Anglo American
  • Apache
  • Arch Coal
  • BHP Billiton
  • BP
  • Canadian Natural Resources
  • Cemex
  • Chevron
  • Conoco Philipps
  • Consol
  • Devon
  • EnCana
  • Eni
  • ExxonMobil
  • Freeport-McMoRan
  • Glencore
  • HeidelbergCement
  • Hess
  • Holcim
  • Husky Energy
  • Italcementi 
  • Kiewit*
  • Lafarge
  • Lukoil
  • Luminant
  • Marathon
  • Murphy Oil
  • Murray Coal
  • North American Coal
  • Occidental
  • OMV
  • Peabody Energy
  • RAG
  • Repsol
  • Rio Tinto
  • Rosneft
  • RWE
  • Sasol
  • Shell
  • Suncor
  • Total
  • UK Coal*
  • Westmoreland

The following companies responded:

  • Anglo American
  • BHP Billiton
  • BP
  • ConocoPhillips
  • Eni
  • Freeport-McMoRan
  • Glencore
  • Lukoil
  • Peabody Energy
  • Repsol
  • Rio Tinto

The following companies declined to respond:

  • Husky Energy

We welcome and encourage companies to publish their responses on this page at any point. Please send your statements to dobson[at]business-humanrights.org

*we have been unable to contact

Company Responses

Anglo American View Response
Glencore View Response
Freeport-McMoRan View Response
Rio Tinto View Response
ConocoPhillips View Response
Peabody Energy View Response
Repsol View Response
Lukoil View Response

Timeline

Privacy information

This site uses cookies and other web storage technologies. You can set your privacy choices below. Changes will take effect immediately.

For more information on our use of web storage, please refer to our Data Usage and Cookies Policy

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

Analytics cookie

ON
OFF

When you access our website we use Google Analytics to collect information on your visit. Accepting this cookie will allow us to understand more details about your journey, and improve how we surface information. All analytics information is anonymous and we do not use it to identify you. Google provides a Google Analytics opt-out add on for all popular browsers.

Promotional cookies

ON
OFF

We share news and updates on business and human rights through third party platforms, including social media and search engines. These cookies help us to understand the performance of these promotions.

Your privacy choices for this site

This site uses cookies and other web storage technologies to enhance your experience beyond necessary core functionality.