Japan: Recruiter ranks foreign trainees' "morality" and "learning ability" by nationality

ginoujissyusei.blog.so-net.jp

As the Japanese parliament was set to adopt legislation providing for foreign "trainee" workers in the caregiving industry, the Cooperative Association for International Operation Research, an officially recognised recruiting organisation for foreign trainees, posted a table on its site ranking the "potential" of foreign trainees by nationality. This table gave each nationality points on categories such as "morality", "learning ability", and whether the dominant religion would be acceptable in Japanese care homes. The organisation was subject to fierce criticism and deleted the table from its website within days.  

The Japanese foreign trainee programme has been heavily criticised since its inception as a hotbed for abuse by domestic and international NGOs, UN human rights bodies, and even the US State Department.

Get RSS feed of these results

All components of this story

Article
27 November 2016

Japan: Recruiter criticized over list ranking foreign trainees by nationality

Author: Shusuke Murai, Japan Times

... It gave 18 out of 20 points to trainees from Myanmar in the “caregiver qualification” category, while giving the lowest 10 points to trainees from Cambodia. The organization says the score was based on whether the trainees have the mindset to offer sincere care or respect elders. It also gave 20 points to Myanmar in the “gap in wages” category, while giving four points to Thailand. The category identified differing economic gaps between trainees’ homes and Japan, suggesting that those with larger income gaps would be “less likely to give up their work even in hard conditions,” the guide explained. Ippei Torii, head of Solidarity Network with Migrants Japan, a support group for foreign workers, said the list represents the real intention of Japanese companies in general, which see the foreign trainee program as a source of cheap labor. ...

Read the full post here

Article
+ 日本語 - Hide

Author: 東京新聞

表では、インドネシア、カンボジア、タイ、フィリピン、ベトナム、ミャンマーの六カ国について「介護への適性」など八項目を設け、計百点満点で評価。「◎」「△」などと優劣を示す記号を併記し、総合点の高い順に並べていた。「介護への適性」の項目では、判断基準を「心から弱者をいたわる奉仕の気持ちがあるか。年長者を尊重する国民性か」と説明。点数の低い国を「△(あまり適していない)」と評価した。他にも「学習能力が高いか」「仕事を投げ出さないか」「日本に強い憧れがあるか」「真面目で純粋な人材が海外に流出し、枯渇していないか」といった基準を記載していた。…

Read the full post here