abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Article

30 Sep 2020

Author:
Niem Chheng, The Phnom Penh Post

Cambodia: Garment Manufacturers Association in Cambodia files a lawsuit at European Court against EU's decision on EBA withdrawal

"GMAC sues​ EU in European court for withdrawing EBA scheme", 27 September 2020

The Garment Manufacturers Association in Cambodia (GMAC) has filed a complaint with the European Court of Justice, requesting that the EU’s 20 per cent withdrawal of the Everything But Arms (EBA) scheme be annulled.

GMAC based its complaint on two legal pleas and an alleged Customs code violation…

In its complaint, GMAC asked the court to annul the EC’s decision to temporarily withdraw EBA benefits because, while the export of 40 different goods from Cambodia to the EU is affected by the withdrawal of 20 per cent of the EBA scheme, of the 40 items, white sugar with HS code 121293 is not among the goods produced by GMAC members…

GMAC made two other pleas concerning the EBA withdrawal. First, it alleged that the EU’s decision violates the principle of proportionality and the requirement of consistency between the EU’s policies and activities.

“The Commission allegedly failed to properly assess the proportionality of the partial temporary withdrawal of Customs preferences for the Cambodian garments, footwear and travel goods sectors,” GMAC said.

The second plea alleged that there was a violation of the applicant’s procedural rights due to the EC’s failure to provide adequate reasoning pursuant to Article 296(2) TFEU, corresponding to a violation of the right to good administration.

GMAC secretary-general Ken Loo said … that the claim was made to oppose the decision to withdraw 20 per cent of the EBA scheme.

… The European Court of Justice said case file T-454/20 was sent to the court ... But a date has not been set to hear it…

Timeline

Privacy information

This site uses cookies and other web storage technologies. You can set your privacy choices below. Changes will take effect immediately.

For more information on our use of web storage, please refer to our Data Usage and Cookies Policy

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

Analytics cookie

ON
OFF

When you access our website we use Google Analytics to collect information on your visit. Accepting this cookie will allow us to understand more details about your journey, and improve how we surface information. All analytics information is anonymous and we do not use it to identify you. Google provides a Google Analytics opt-out add on for all popular browsers.

Promotional cookies

ON
OFF

We share news and updates on business and human rights through third party platforms, including social media and search engines. These cookies help us to understand the performance of these promotions.

Your privacy choices for this site

This site uses cookies and other web storage technologies to enhance your experience beyond necessary core functionality.