abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

The content is also available in the following languages: français

Article

18 May 2022

Author:
Sherpa & the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR)

Charges Confirmed against Lafarge for Complicity in Crimes against Humanity in Syria

Today, the Investigative Chamber of the Paris Court of Appeals decided: French multinational Lafarge is facing the charge of complicity in crimes against humanity. Lafarge, via its subsidiary, has allegedly paid up to 13 million euro to several armed groups including the Islamic State in order to keep its Syrian cement factory running. ECCHR and Sherpa, the NGOs which initiated this case, welcome this decisive ruling which confirms that a company alleged of knowingly paying several million euro to a criminal organisation, can face charges of complicity in the gravest crimes.

Today’s ruling follows the 7 September 2021 groundbreaking decision of the Cour de cassation, France’s highest court, which had clarified the legal framework under which a company may be charged with complicity in crimes against humanity...

...Lafarge also remains charged with deliberately endangering the lives of its Syrian employees.

Mohammad, a former employee of Lafarge Cement Syria and plaintiff in the case, reacted: “Today’s decision brings us one step closer to justice. For the sake of profits, Lafarge put me and my colleagues’ lives at risk. It is important that such big corporations see that they can be held accountable, and that power and wealth do not allow them to act without consequences.”

“This ruling should be a strong wake-up call for companies doing business in conflict zones. Companies can no longer justify their involvement in criminal actions with financial reasons. If they enable or fuel crimes – even if they only pursue commercial purposes – they might be complicit and should be held accountable”, stated Cannelle Lavite, co-director of ECCHR’s business and human rights program...

Timeline

Privacy information

This site uses cookies and other web storage technologies. You can set your privacy choices below. Changes will take effect immediately.

For more information on our use of web storage, please refer to our Data Usage and Cookies Policy

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

Analytics cookie

ON
OFF

When you access our website we use Google Analytics to collect information on your visit. Accepting this cookie will allow us to understand more details about your journey, and improve how we surface information. All analytics information is anonymous and we do not use it to identify you. Google provides a Google Analytics opt-out add on for all popular browsers.

Promotional cookies

ON
OFF

We share news and updates on business and human rights through third party platforms, including social media and search engines. These cookies help us to understand the performance of these promotions.

Your privacy choices for this site

This site uses cookies and other web storage technologies to enhance your experience beyond necessary core functionality.