abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Story

17 Mar 2025

EU: Coffee sector must "cease...attacks" of deforestation legislation amid "harmful" lobbying by coffee federations, says report; incl. cos. responses & non-responses

It is time to wake up, smell the regulation, and comply with the law. The industry is well-positioned to do so, and as this paper shows, is at no disadvantage relative to other regulated sectors.
Coffee Watch

In February 2025, Coffee Watch released a report alleging the European Coffee Federation and Deutscher Kaffeeverband have conducted “harmful lobbying” against the European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR). The report names several companies who are represented by the European and German Coffee Federations, including 4C, Dallmayr, ECOM, Illycaffe, JDE Peet’s, Lavazza, Louis Dreyfus, Melitta, Nestle, Neumann Kaffee Grupp, Olam, Segafredo, Starbucks, Tchibo, and Touton.

The report calls on the coffee sector to “cease its attacks” on the regulation and “focus on compliance”. It argues this should be done because of coffee production’s adverse impact on deforestation and labour rights violations. The report also says coffee supply chains are not particularly complex and the coffee industry does not face “unique” challenges regarding smallholder production relative to other products, meaning regulation compliance is possible. The reporting goes on to argue that many companies, including Nestle, JDE Peet’s, Starbucks, Olam, ECOM, Louis Dreyfus, and Touton, already have the “building blocks” in place to comply with the EUDR. The reporting argues companies cannot ‘commit to being deforestation free’ but also argue they are ‘unable to comply with the EUDR’.

The report highlights the prevalence of certifications in the sector, which it says should be a “major competitive advantage” regarding EUDR compliance. However, an accompanying Mongabay article also says certification schemes should do more as “few ... truly guarantee deforestation-free coffee”.

In March 2025, the Business & Human Rights Resource Centre invited 4C, Dallmayr, ECOM, Illycaffe, JDE Peet’s, Lavazza, Louis Dreyfus, Melitta, Nestle, Neumann Kaffee Grupp, Olam, Segafredo, Starbucks, Tchibo, and Touton to respond to the reporting. Responses from 4C, Dallmayr, Illycaffe, JDE Peet’s, Lavazza, Louis Dreyfus, Melitta, Nestle, Neumann Kaffee Grupp, Olam, and Tchibo can be read in full below. ECOM, Segafredo, Starbucks and Touton did not respond.

The Resource Centre also received statements from the European Coffee Federation and Deutscher Kaffeeverband. The European Coffee Federation emphasised that it has always been "driven by a commitment to [the EUDR's] objectives" instead of "any attempt to undermine it", and highlights its role in "informing and supporting the coffee sector's understanding of the EUDR". Deutscher Kaffeeverband said it is a "proactive advocate for sustainable coffee supply chains" with a "stringent proactive approach". The statements from both coffee federations can be read in full below.

Company Responses

4C Services GmbH View Response
Dallmayr View Response
Melitta Group View Response
Segafredo Zanetti

No Response

Ecom Agroindustrial

No Response

Illycaffè View Response
Lavazza View Response
Nestlé View Response
Starbucks

No Response

Tchibo (part of Maxingvest) View Response
Jacobs Douwe Egberts View Response
Louis Dreyfus View Response
Touton

No Response

Neumann Kaffee Gruppe View Response

Timeline

Privacy information

This site uses cookies and other web storage technologies. You can set your privacy choices below. Changes will take effect immediately.

For more information on our use of web storage, please refer to our Data Usage and Cookies Policy

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

Analytics cookie

ON
OFF

When you access our website we use Google Analytics to collect information on your visit. Accepting this cookie will allow us to understand more details about your journey, and improve how we surface information. All analytics information is anonymous and we do not use it to identify you. Google provides a Google Analytics opt-out add on for all popular browsers.

Promotional cookies

ON
OFF

We share news and updates on business and human rights through third party platforms, including social media and search engines. These cookies help us to understand the performance of these promotions.

Your privacy choices for this site

This site uses cookies and other web storage technologies to enhance your experience beyond necessary core functionality.