abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube
Article

4 Apr 2025

Author:
Amanda Silberling, TechCrunch

Meta officially ends its US fact-checking program

"Meta officially says goodbye to its US fact-checkers on Monday", 4 April 2025

Meta will no longer have any fact-checkers in the U.S. ..., according to chief global affairs officer Joel Kaplan.

Meta announced this significant policy change in January when it also loosened its content moderation rules.

The timing of this change coincided with President Trump’s inauguration, which Meta founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg attended after donating $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund. Around the same time, Zuckerberg added Dana White, a longtime Trump ally and CEO of UFC, to Meta’s board.

“The recent elections also feel like a cultural tipping point towards once again prioritizing speech,” Zuckerberg said in a video announcing the moderation changes.

Yet some of the speech that Zuckerberg is so intent on prioritizing comes at the expense of marginalized people.

“We do allow allegations of mental illness or abnormality when based on gender or sexual orientation, given political and religious discourse about transgenderism and homosexuality,” Meta’s hateful conduct policy reads.

Meta is modeling its new fact-checking efforts after Community Notes at Elon Musk’s X, which puts the onus of moderation in part on other users rather than paid professionals.

...

While this community-based approach to content moderation can sometimes provide important context to misleading or controversial posts, it functions better in tandem with other content moderation tools, which Meta is eliminating.

Meta’s greatest currency is its users’ attention, and less content moderation means that there are more posts for people to see — plus, Meta’s news feed tends to surface content that generates a strong reaction.

Already, as Meta began rolling back its fact-checking programs, false content has begun to spread. One Facebook page manager, who spread the viral, fake claim that ICE will pay people $750 to tip them off about undocumented immigrants, told ProPublica that the end of the fact-checking program is “great information.”

...

Privacy information

This site uses cookies and other web storage technologies. You can set your privacy choices below. Changes will take effect immediately.

For more information on our use of web storage, please refer to our Data Usage and Cookies Policy

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

Analytics cookie

ON
OFF

When you access our website we use Google Analytics to collect information on your visit. Accepting this cookie will allow us to understand more details about your journey, and improve how we surface information. All analytics information is anonymous and we do not use it to identify you. Google provides a Google Analytics opt-out add on for all popular browsers.

Promotional cookies

ON
OFF

We share news and updates on business and human rights through third party platforms, including social media and search engines. These cookies help us to understand the performance of these promotions.

Your privacy choices for this site

This site uses cookies and other web storage technologies to enhance your experience beyond necessary core functionality.