abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Article

28 Oct 2020

Author:
Finnwatch

Q&A: Criminal and Civil Prosecutions - Natural Fruit vs. Andy Hall

28 October 2020

[...]

4. What is the current state of play with the four cases brought by Natural Fruit against Andy Hall?

a) Criminal Defamation Case – Al Jazeera Interview – Case Closed, and Hall’s Counter Prosecutions

[...]

[...] Hall was removed as a defendant in the case due to his absence from Thailand. [...] Natural Fruit did not appeal the ruling.

b) Criminal Defamation and Computer Crimes Case – Finnwatch Report – Case Closed

[...]

Bangkok South Criminal Court on 31st May 2018 read the verdict of the Appeals Court ruling in favour of Andy Hall. [...] The Court also ruled [...] that [...] Hall had indeed interviewed migrant workers from Natural Fruit’s factory and there was the real possibility of labour rights violations [...].

[...] The Appeals Court’s decision was appealed to Thailand’s Supreme Court by Natural Fruit. [...] On 30th June 2020, Thailand’s Supreme Court upheld the Appeals Court’s acquittal of Andy Hall.

c) Civil Defamation and Damages Case – Finnwatch Report

[...]

[...][O]n 28th October 2020, Natural Fruit confirmed it was withdrawing the case [...].

d) Civil Defamation and Damages Case – Al Jazeera Interview Natural Fruit

[...]

On 26th March 2018, the Prakanong Court read its verdict on the case, ordering Andy Hall to pay 10 million baht in damages to Natural Fruit [...].

[...] Appeals Court delivered its verdict [...] upholding Hall’s conviction.

Hall instructed his legal team to again appeal this conviction for a final time to Thailand’s Supreme Court [...]. [...] [T]he Prakanong Court adjourned reading the Supreme Court verdict stating that the verdict would be reconsidered at Hall’s legal team’s request in light of the June 2020 Supreme Court dismissal of the criminal case (b) against Hall.

[...]

Timeline

Privacy information

This site uses cookies and other web storage technologies. You can set your privacy choices below. Changes will take effect immediately.

For more information on our use of web storage, please refer to our Data Usage and Cookies Policy

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

Analytics cookie

ON
OFF

When you access our website we use Google Analytics to collect information on your visit. Accepting this cookie will allow us to understand more details about your journey, and improve how we surface information. All analytics information is anonymous and we do not use it to identify you. Google provides a Google Analytics opt-out add on for all popular browsers.

Promotional cookies

ON
OFF

We share news and updates on business and human rights through third party platforms, including social media and search engines. These cookies help us to understand the performance of these promotions.

Your privacy choices for this site

This site uses cookies and other web storage technologies to enhance your experience beyond necessary core functionality.