Company Response
This is a response to
China Labor Watch submission to UN Working Group on business & human rights
Timeline
-
Response by Jabil Circuit: China Labor Watch submission to UN Working Group on business & human rights highlights poor working conditions in 10 Apple supplier factories.
-
Pegatron did not respond to: China Labor Watch submission to UN Working Group on business & human rights highlights poor working conditions in 10 Apple supplier factories.
-
Apple did not respond to: China Labor Watch submission to UN Working Group on business & human rights highlights poor working conditions in 10 Apple supplier factories.
-
Response by Wintek: China Labor Watch submission to UN Working Group on business & human rights highlights poor working conditions in 10 Apple supplier factories.
-
Response by Toyo Rikagaku Kenkyusho: China Labor Watch submission to UN Working Group on business & human rights highlights poor working conditions in 10 Apple supplier factories.
-
Catcher Technology did not respond to: China Labor Watch submission to UN Working Group on business & human rights highlights poor working conditions in 10 Apple supplier factories.
-
Beyond Foxconn: Deplorable Working Conditions Characterize Apple’s Entire Supply Chain [China]
-
Foxconn (part of Hon Hai) did not respond to: China Labor Watch submission to UN Working Group on business & human rights highlights poor working conditions in 10 Apple supplier factories.
-
Response by Quanta Computer: China Labor Watch submission to UN Working Group on business & human rights highlights poor working conditions in 10 Apple supplier factories.
-
[PDF] Apple Supplier Responsibility - 2013 Progress Report
View full story