abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Article

18 Sep 2021

Author:
Lauren Chaplin, Leigh Day

Commentary: Third draft of UN business and human rights treaty launched on 17 August 2021

The text has been prepared by the open-ended intergovernmental working group (‘OEIGWG’) on transnational corporations and other business enterprises, established...to develop a binding legal instrument to build on the soft law foundation laid over the past decade by the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (‘UNGPs’).

…[T]he treaty’s remit is far-reaching, requiring that all businesses, irrespective of size, are human rights compliant …

…[It] makes clear that responsibility for business activities lies with both private and public actors…[requiring] States to ‘take all necessary legislative, administrative and other action […] to ensure effective implementation…

The drafters ... [called] for HRDD costs to be integrated into business contracts … [requiring] that States make sure that businesses ‘establish and maintain financial security … to cover potential claims of compensation’ … [also] that States establish an international fund for victims, to provide legal and financial aid to those who would otherwise not be able to access remedy.

…[It] seeks public and periodic reporting on non-financial matters…necessary to both evidence claims and identify the correct defendant(s).

…[Regarding] access to remedy, [it] calls on States to remove legal obstacles, including the principle of forum non conveniens … to allow judges to reverse the burden of proof where such reversal is necessary to ensure victims’ access to remedy.

[I]t mandates that States shall ensure that their domestic law provides for the criminal or functionally equivalent liability of legal persons for human rights abuses that amount to criminal offences under international human rights law, customary international law (‘CIL’), or domestic law.

…EU delegates…maintained that the text required much work to ‘become a basis for a legally sound, implementable, and enforceable instrument'...

Timeline

Privacy information

This site uses cookies and other web storage technologies. You can set your privacy choices below. Changes will take effect immediately.

For more information on our use of web storage, please refer to our Data Usage and Cookies Policy

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

Analytics cookie

ON
OFF

When you access our website we use Google Analytics to collect information on your visit. Accepting this cookie will allow us to understand more details about your journey, and improve how we surface information. All analytics information is anonymous and we do not use it to identify you. Google provides a Google Analytics opt-out add on for all popular browsers.

Promotional cookies

ON
OFF

We share news and updates on business and human rights through third party platforms, including social media and search engines. These cookies help us to understand the performance of these promotions.

Your privacy choices for this site

This site uses cookies and other web storage technologies to enhance your experience beyond necessary core functionality.