abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Article

26 Jan 2009

Author:
Ben Hallman, American Lawyer

More Bad News for Lead Paint Plaintiffs [USA]

...Rhode Island taxpayers...may have to cough up $240,000 to pay costs associated with two examiners hired by the state as part of a sweeping abatement plan... [The] decision by Rhode Island superior court Judge Michael Silverstein may have a chilling effect on whether other states pursue class action suits against lead paint makers. Laura Ellsworth, a Jones Day attorney for Sherwin-Williams Co. who argued on behalf of the defendants (the other two are NL Industries and Millennium Holdings [part of Access Industries]), told us that states may think twice when plaintiffs firms tell them that bringing these types of suits is a cost-free exercise.