abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Article

1 Apr 2009

Author:
Emma Wilson, Intl. Institute for Environment & Development, for The Forests Dialogue

[PDF] Company-Led Approaches to Conflict Resolution in the Forest Sector

This discussion paper explores the potential for addressing conflict in the forest sector through the use of company-led tools and mechanisms... The paper offers examples of tools and approaches that are being employed by companies and non-industry players working closely with companies to address conflict-related issues. These include efforts by Aracruz Cellulose in Brazil to build dialogue with local indigenous groups in order to address a long-running dispute over land rights; the experience of APRIL in Indonesia in developing a land dispute resolution protocol based on the principles of FPIC; and the corporate strategies and tools employed by major companies such as Stora Enso, Mondi [part of Anglo American] and Weyerhaueser. [also refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers, Congolaise Industrielle des Bois (CIB, part of Dalhoff Larsen & Horneman - DLH), Veracel (joint venture Aracruz Cellulose & Stora Enso), Gunns, Norkse Skog Boyer Mills Australia, Timberlands Pacific, FEA (Forest Enterprises Australia), Great Southern, Sappi]