abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Article

1 Nov 2010

Author:
Corporate Responsibility (CORE) Coalition

[PDF] Protecting rights, repairing harm: How state-based non-judicial mechanisms can help fill gaps in existing frameworks for the protection of human rights of people affected by corporate activities

[submission to UN Special Representative John Ruggie] There are clearly gaps in the current human rights accountability system. The most serious flaw is the lack of accessible methods of resolving human rights-related disputes between people and companies that are both fit for purpose and capable of producing legally binding outcomes...The aim of this paper is to show how state-based non-judicial mechanisms (or “NJMs”) can help to bridge those gaps...[T]his paper [concludes] with some general observations about the potential role of state-based NJMs in helping to overcome existing barriers to redress. It is acknowledged that state-based NJMs are no “silver bullet” as there are limits to what they can achieve in isolation. Nevertheless, they should be viewed as a vital part of a wider package of possible enforcement options for victims of human rights abuses.