hide message

A message from Executive Director Phil Bloomer

Now more than ever, advocates in NGOs and business need the information we provide to continue to put human rights at the centre of business.

We are a small non-profit with a huge mission. We can only provide our global coverage and Weekly Updates with donations from people like you.

Please consider contributing to our work today. No gift is too small!

Thank you,
Phil Bloomer, Executive Director

Donate now hide message

SOMO report examines records of 8 extractive companies on human rights & tax avoidance (2013)

In July 2013, Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations (SOMO) published a report that analyses the tax avoidance & human rights records of 8 big extractive companies (see press release and full report "Private Gain - Public Loss: Mailbox companies, tax avoidance and human rights").  Either the parent company or "an important subsidiary" of all 8 firms is incorporated in Netherlands, according to report.  The report argues that Dutch tax and investment policy does not adequately take into account the potential human rights impacts of the companies it attracts.

According to the research, the companies or their subsidiaries “are responsible for or associated with serious human rights violations, ranging from environmental pollution damaging the health of local communities to militia violence, killings and displacements.”

Moreover, the report examines how companies use their structures and fiscal planning to avoid taxes: The 8 companies’ “structure allows for profit shifting to low-tax jurisdictions, indicating that the [they] use the Netherlands for tax planning purposes. By actively facilitating and attracting these companies, the Dutch state contributes to the loss of revenue that is economically destructive to poor countries and undermines obligations of these states in protecting and fulfilling human rights.” (See here for more information about the link between tax avoidance & human rights)

The Dutch Government has discussed the report with SOMO.  In September 2013, it issued a statement on its tax rules (available here, only in Dutch).  In response, SOMO welcomed its commitment to tackle tax avoidance at the national & international level (see SOMO's press release here).

Company responses

Business & Human Rights Resource Centre invited the following companies to respond to the report:

- Barrick Gold response [PDF]
- China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) declined to respond (see here for CNPC's previous response to allegations related to Shwe Gas Project)
- Freeport-McMoran Copper & Gold response [PDF]
- Glencore response (also refers to Mopani Copper Mines) [PDF]
  Additional materials submitted by Glencore:
   - submission on inquiry into link between taxation and development & Addendum [PDF]
   - comments on Mopani tax payments [PDF]
   - letter from Mopani Copper Mines Auditors [PDF]
- Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC) did not respond
- Oilinvest did not respond
- Pluspetrol response [PDF]
- Trafigura response [DOC]

In addition, we also invited Mozal to respond to allegation mentioned in the report. It did not do so.

Get RSS feed of these results

Related stories and components

Article
1 July 2013

SOMO report examines records of 8 extractive companies on human rights & tax avoidance – company responses & non-responses provided

Author: Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations (SOMO)

In July 2013, Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations (SOMO) published a report ("Private Gain - Public Loss: Mailbox companies, tax avoidance and human rights") that analyses the tax avoidance & human rights record of 8 big extractive...

Read more

Company response
8 June 2013

Response by Freeport-McMoRan: SOMO report examines records of 8 extractive companies on human rights & tax avoidance.

Read full response