Uganda: Locals to be displaced by oil pipeline oppose land valuation process; includes Total's comments
"Residents protest oil pipeline valuation process"
Residents of Lwengo, Rakai, and Kyotera districts have protested the irregularities in the valuation process of the East African Crude Oil Pipeline project. Total Uganda contracted NEWPLAN Limited to carry out the mapping and valuation exercise. It rolled out operations around April 2018. In Lwengo district, at least over 150 households in Lwengo Town Council, Lwengo rural and Ndagwe sub-county claim the company failed to follow guidelines of such a big project which may affect the whole process. Cosma Kyebanja, one of the Project Affected People (PAPs) in Byangiri village in Kitto parish, Lwengo Rural, says they are being harassed and forced to sign different forms without clear explanation...
John Tamale Kanagoba, the Kito Parish Chairperson says that residents claim that the company workers often take advantage of illiterate residents, especially the elderly, to manipulate figures. He further notes that in some meetings, company’s valuers trick the Local Council (LCI) chairperson to stamp and sign empty forms without explanation which has posed many questions. George William Mutabaazi, the Lwengo District Chairperson, says that it was discovered that the company did not document some of the resident’s buildings including residential houses mosques, eucalyptus trees, plus food plantations namely banana, coffee, maize, and beans for compensation while others are undervalued...
NEWPLAN’s Public Relations Officer Daniel Walusimbi referred us to Total Uganda for further inquiries about residents’ concerns. He says they make daily field reports and submit them to Total. A Total Uganda official, who preferred anonymity, says that they have received several complaints about NEWPLAN. He says that if they mess up the project Total may be forced to cancel their contract. He says that each property that is destroyed must be valued fairly. “When the subcontractor works contrary to the set guidelines, it is the main contractor’s image which is tarnished,” he stated.