hide message

What do you think about our communications?

Our website received over 2 million visits last year. We delivered briefings, analysis and met with hundreds of local groups across the world.

We want to understand our audiences better and ensure that our communications, content and products are meeting your needs and driving impact. We would be very grateful if you could input into a quick survey on our communications activities.

Please take 2 minutes to complete a short survey

Thank you

Go to survey hide message

USA: District Judge's decision upholds new unionisation law for Uber & Lyft drivers in Seattle

Get RSS feed of these results

All components of this story

Article
11 August 2017

Judge dismisses lawsuit seeking to block law allowing Uber and Lyft drivers to form unions

Author: Jeremy B. White, Independent (UK)

In a ruling that helps define the rights of labourers in the booming gig economy, a federal judge has dismissed a legal challenge to a Seattle ordinance allowing drivers-for-hire to form unions. The lawsuit parallels a national fight over the rights of workers in an industry that relies heavily on independent contractors, rather than full-time employees, to sustain businesses like Lyft and Uber. After a 2015 Seattle ordinance allowing those drivers to form such organisations took effect and a Teamsters union obtained permission to organise workers, the US Chamber of Commerce sued on the grounds that allowing independent contractors to organise violated federal antitrust and labour laws. The organisation, of which Uber and Lyft are members, argued that allowing the ordinance to proceed would stifle competition...A second pending lawsuit will continue to prevent the Seattle ordinance from taking effect. In a statement, the US Chamber of Commerce said that “the City’s unlawful ordinance would stifle innovation and undermine economic growth. We continue to believe it should not be allowed to take effect,” and Uber said in a statement that it planned to appeal against Mr Lasnik’s ruling...

Read the full post here

Lawsuit
1 August 2017

Court order: Chamber of Commerce of the USA & others vs The City of Seattle & others

Author: United States District Judge Robert S. Lasnik, United States District Court Western District of Washington at Seattle

Order granting Defendants' motion to dismiss the City of Seattle Ordinance 124968.

Read the full post here

Article
1 August 2017

Judge tosses U.S. Chamber lawsuit over Seattle’s Uber union law, but dispute isn’t over yet

Author: Nat Levy, Geekwire (USA)

Seattle’s first-of-its-kind unionization law for drivers of services like Uber and Lyft got a big win in court Tuesday when a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit brought against the controversial ordinance by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

However…U.S. District Judge Robert Lasnik left in place an injunction that stops the city from implementing the law because another lawsuit against it remains ongoing. In a statement, Uber General Manager for the Pacific Northwest Brooke Steger said Uber plans to appeal the ruling…The chamber also issued a statement…“We are…exploring all options for further review…The City’s unlawful ordinance would stifle innovation and undermine economic growth...”

…The law, passed last year, gives drivers the ability to band together to negotiate pay rates and employment conditions…Currently, these drivers…are not protected by traditional labor standards — including…minimum wage law. They also do not have collective bargaining rights…

The most controversial aspect of the law concerns which drivers get to vote on collective bargaining…Ride-hailing companies…favor giving every driver a vote, without the type of restrictions in Seattle’s rules…

Read the full post here