War on Want report & responses

War on Want report "Fanning the Flames": company responses

In November 2007, War on Want released a report, "Fanning the Flames: The role of British mining companies in conflict and the violation of human rights". The Business & Human Rights Resource Centre invited the companies referred to in the report to respond to the concerns raised: the results to date are indicated below.

Company responses / non-responses:

Anglo American indicated that we should link to the response they gave to a previous War on Want report in August 2007 [PDF]

AngloGold Ashanti said they have nothing to add to the responses by Anglo American (see above) and ICMM (see below).

BHP Billiton said they have nothing to add to the ICMM response and advised readers interested in understanding their policies, standards and practices to review their Sustainability Report.

Global Coal Management response [PDF]

Monterrico Metals response [DOC]

Oxus Gold response [DOC]

Rio Tinto response [DOC]

Sibuyan Nickel Property Development Corp (SNPDC) statement regarding the incident referred to in the report

Vedanta Resources response [DOC]

Xstrata has indicated that it will respond, but has not yet done so

Additional materials:

International Council on Mining & Metals (ICMM) sent a letter to War on Want in response to the report [PDF]

Get RSS feed of these results

Related stories and components

Company response
19 December 2007

Response by BHP Billiton: "Fanning the Flames": War on Want report alleges UK mining companies, including BHP Billiton, involved in human rights abuses overseas.

Read full response

Company response
12 December 2007

Response by Anglo American: "Fanning the Flames": War on Want report alleges UK mining companies, including Anglo American, involved in human rights abuses overseas.

Read full response

Company response
12 December 2007

Response by Monterrico Metals (part of Zijin): "Fanning the Flames": War on Want report alleges UK mining companies, including Monterrico Metals, involved in human rights abuses overseas. Click here

Read full response

Company response
12 December 2007

Response by Oxus Gold: "Fanning the Flames": War on Want report alleges UK mining companies, including Oxus Gold, involved in human rights abuses overseas.

Read full response

Company response
12 December 2007

Response by Rio Tinto: "Fanning the Flames": War on Want report alleges UK mining companies, including Rio Tinto, involved in human rights abuses overseas.

Read full response

Company response
12 December 2007

Response by Vedanta Resources: "Fanning the Flames": War on Want report alleges UK mining companies, including Vedanta, involved in human rights abuses overseas.

Read full response

Article
12 December 2007

War on Want report "Fanning the Flames": company responses

Author: Compiled by Business & Human Rights Resource Centre

In November 2007, War on Want released a report, "Fanning the Flames: The role of British mining companies in conflict and the violation of human rights". The Business & Human Rights Resource Centre invited the companies referred to in the report...

Read more

Company non-response
12 December 2007

Xstrata (part of Glencore Xstrata) did not respond to: "Fanning the Flames": War on Want report alleges UK mining companies, including Xstrata, involved in human rights abuses overseas.

Read more

Company response
12 November 2007

Response by Global Coal Management (see GCM Resources): Fanning the Flames: War on Want report alleges UK mining companies, including Global Coal Management, involved in human rights abuses overseas.

Read full response