abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

Esta página no está disponible en Español y está siendo mostrada en English

Artículo

17 Dic 2021

Autor:
Trade Justice Movement, BHRRC, Greenpeace UK and 16 others

UK: CSOs raise concerns about Australia trade deal

Tom Fisk

'CSOs raise concerns about Australia deal', 17 December 2021

"Eighteen civil society organisations have today written to Anne-Marie Trevelyan to raise concerns about the UK-Australia Free Trade Agreement that was signed this morning.

The letter raises particular concerns about the likely impact of the deal on climate action - particularly worrying given that the UK retains the COP presidency until the end of next year. Australia is a well-known climate laggard, with serious issues in relation to the clearance of forest for cattle farming and the influence of mining lobbies which has halted progress on climate policy.

Organisations are concerned about the impact of the deal on UK standards, in particular food standards and animal welfare. Chapters on the environment, animal welfare and development are non-binding, unlike the other provisions of the deal.

Organisations welcome the exclusion of ISDS, however the deal still contains an investment chapter with many of the same problematic provisions that can be found in other investment chapters. There is also the risk that the exclusion is rendered meaningless if both countries are covered by the ISDS provisions in the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP).

Finally, the letter calls for a thorough process of public and parliamentary scrutiny. It appears there will be a nine to twelve month window to analyse the deal, which is more than had been anticipated. Organisations hope that the government will use this time to undertake meaningful consultation. However it remains the case that there is no guarantee of a debate or binding vote for parliamentarians..."

Línea del tiempo

Información de privacidad

Este sitio usa cookies y otras tecnologías de almacenamiento web. Puede configurar sus preferencias de privacidad más adelante. Los cambios se aplicarán de inmediato.

Para más información sobre el uso que hacemos del almacenamiento web, por favor consulte nuestra Política de Cookies y Uso de Datos

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

Cookies analíticas

ON
OFF

Cuando accede a nuestro sitio web, utilizamos Google Analytics para recopilar información sobre su visita. La aceptación de esta cookie nos permitirá conocer más detalles sobre su visita y mejorar la forma en que mostramos la información. Toda la información analítica es anónima y no la utilizamos para identificarle. Google proporciona un complemento de inhabilitación de Google Analytics para todos los navegadores populares.

Cookies promocionales

ON
OFF

Compartimos noticias y actualizaciones sobre empresas y derechos humanos a través de plataformas de terceros, incluidas las redes sociales y los motores de búsqueda. Estas cookies nos ayudan a comprender el rendimiento de estas promociones.

Sus preferencias de privacidad en este sitio

Este sitio usa cookies y otras tecnologías de almacenamiento web para mejorar su experiencia, mas allá de la funcionalidad básica necesaria.