abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

Esta página no está disponible en Español y está siendo mostrada en English

Demanda

22 Feb 2016

Gun industry lawsuit (re Sandy Hook shooting in USA)

Estatus: CLOSED

Fecha de presentación de la demanda judicial
22 Feb 2016
Desconocido
Niños
Lugar de presentación: Estados Unidos
Lugar del incidente: Estados Unidos
Tipo de litigio: Nacional

Empresas

Bushmaster Firearms International, LLC Estados Unidos Armas y artefactos
Remington Outdoor Estados Unidos Armas y artefactos

Fuentes

Snapshot: In February 2014, relatives of victims of the Sandy Hook shooting filed a lawsuit in the US against the gun manufacturer Bushmaster Firearms (part of Remington Outdoor), the distributor Camfour Inc, and the East Windsor gun shop that sold the assault rifle. The plaintiffs argue that the way in which these companies sold and marketed the military-style weapon to the civilian market is a form of negligence that makes them liable for the wrongful deaths of the children killed during the shooting. Remington denied the accusations.

Legal proceedings

In February 2014, relatives of victims of the Sandy Hook shooting filed a lawsuit in the US against Bushmaster Firearms (part of Remington Outdoor), Camfour Inc, and the East Windsor gun shop.  In April 2016, a judge ruled that the case could proceed, rejecting the defendants' motions to dismiss. In October 2016, the Connecticut superior court dismissed the case based on the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, ruling that the companies could not be held liable for harm caused solely by the criminal misuse of a weapon.

In March 2017, the victims' families filed a brief in the state Supreme Court seeking to reinstate their lawsuit against the gun manufacturer. In May 2017, the gun manufacturers asked the Connecticut Supreme Court to dismiss the case.  They argued that only the shop that sold the gun could face a negligent entrustment suit but that it would not be successful as the shop followed the law in selling the gun. In March 2019, the Connecticut Supreme Court revived the lawsuit, saying that the families could sue for wrongful marketing under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act. In April 2019, Remington asked the US Supreme court to hear the case and decide if gun manufacturers should be held accountable for crimes committed with their products.

In March 2020, a Connecticut judge denied gunmaker Remington Outdoor’s request to access the Sandy Hook shooter’s psychological and medical records. The Court ruled these could not be disclosed due to laws protecting patient privacy. 

In June 2020, Remington asked for the lawsuit to be dismissed on the grounds that no facts presented in the complaint connected its marketing to the shooting.

On 28 July 2020, Remington Outdoor filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. Families of the victims from the Sandy Hook shooting argued that gun-manufacturer Remington Outdoor was seeking an accelerated sale in bankruptcy court in order to run from its lawsuit. The application for bankruptcy protection was approved by a court in Alabama, and stayed the lawsuit for months.

On 26 July 2021, a Connecticut Superior Court Judge denied the company's request to dismiss the lawsuit. A few days later, the company offered some of the victims' families nearly $33 million to settle their lawsuit. The settlements were offered by Ironshore and James River, two of Remington's insurers.

In February 2022, the families of nine victims announced they have agreed to a $73 million settlement on the lawsuit against Remington.

Línea del tiempo

Información de privacidad

Este sitio usa cookies y otras tecnologías de almacenamiento web. Puede configurar sus preferencias de privacidad más adelante. Los cambios se aplicarán de inmediato.

Para más información sobre el uso que hacemos del almacenamiento web, por favor consulte nuestra Política de Cookies y Uso de Datos

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

Cookies analíticas

ON
OFF

Cuando accede a nuestro sitio web, utilizamos Google Analytics para recopilar información sobre su visita. La aceptación de esta cookie nos permitirá conocer más detalles sobre su visita y mejorar la forma en que mostramos la información. Toda la información analítica es anónima y no la utilizamos para identificarle. Google proporciona un complemento de inhabilitación de Google Analytics para todos los navegadores populares.

Cookies promocionales

ON
OFF

Compartimos noticias y actualizaciones sobre empresas y derechos humanos a través de plataformas de terceros, incluidas las redes sociales y los motores de búsqueda. Estas cookies nos ayudan a comprender el rendimiento de estas promociones.

Sus preferencias de privacidad en este sitio

Este sitio usa cookies y otras tecnologías de almacenamiento web para mejorar su experiencia, mas allá de la funcionalidad básica necesaria.