abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

Esta página no está disponible en Español y está siendo mostrada en English

Demanda (SLAPP)

21 Jul 2021

SAVE Rivers

Estatus: ONGOING

Fecha de presentación de la demanda judicial
21 Jul 2021
Exactitud de fecha
Todo correcto
Civil
No aplicable
SAVE Rivers
Grupo de inquietudes medioambientales
Demandas: SLAPP
Demandas legales: Difamación
Cantidad de daños: $1.182.785
Cantidad de daños (local): RM5 million
Demanda presentada por: Company
Objetivo: Grupo, organización o institución
Lugar de presentación: Malasia
Lugar del incidente: Malasia
Samling Malasia Tala y madera Respuesta de la empresa

Fuentes

On 21 June 2021, the logging company Samling Plywood filed a defamation lawsuit against SAVE Rivers and its directors for publishing alleged defamatory statements. The company seeks an apology, an injunction stopping SAVE Rivers from reporting community claims, and RM5 million in damages (around 1 million USD). SAVE Rivers has alleged that the concession issued in favor of Samling was allegedly done without compliance with due process and thereby allegedly in violation of the rights of the indigenous communities. Several communities also alleged that they were not consulted about the concessions before their approval. A coalition of local and international organizations, including the Bruno Manser Fund and The Borneo Project, have called on Samling to drop the lawsuit. We invited the company to respond; it did. A rejoinder from The Borneo Project is available here.