abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

Esta página no está disponible en Español y está siendo mostrada en English

Demanda

1 Ene 2024

US Interior Department and Bureau of Land Management lawsuit (re SunZia wind energy project, USA)

Estatus: ONGOING

Fecha de presentación de la demanda judicial
1 Ene 2024
Exactitud de fecha
Año y mes correctos
No aplicable
Pueblos indígenas, Defensor de los Derechos Humanos, NGO
Lugar de presentación: Estados Unidos
Lugar del incidente: Estados Unidos
Tipo de litigio: Nacional

Empresas

Pattern Energy Estados Unidos Energía solar, Energía eólica

Against other:

Government

Fuentes

Snapshot: In January 2024, Native American tribes, including the Tohono O'odham, Hopi, Zuni, and San Carlos Apache Tribe, along with the Center for Biological Diversity and Archaeology Southwest, filed a lawsuit against the US Interior Department and the Bureau of Land Management with the US District Court for the District of Arizona. They challenged the approval of the $10 billion SunZia-operated transmission line intended to carry wind-generated energy from New Mexico to other states across the US. They argued that the Bureau had failed to fulfil its obligations to identify historic sites and that the project would cause irreversible damage to the land ecologically and culturally. They asked the Court to issue an injunction to halt the construction. In April 2024, the court rejected their demands, citing that the plaintiffs filed their claims too late and the Bureau had already fulfilled its obligations to identify historic sites. The plaintiffs appealed. On 6 June 2024, a US District Judge dismissed the claims on the same grounds. The environmentalists are likely to appeal. In April 2024, they asked a US federal Court of Appeals to intervene in their case.