abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

Esta página no está disponible en Español y está siendo mostrada en English

Demanda

1 Ene 2015

Xstrata lawsuit (re violent protests in Peru, filed in the UK)

Estatus: ONGOING

Fecha de presentación de la demanda judicial
1 Ene 2015
Exactitud de fecha
Año correcto
No aplicable
Defensor de los Derechos Humanos, Pueblos indígenas, Comunidad
Abogado del demandante: Leigh Day
Lugar de presentación: Reino Unido
Lugar del incidente: Perú
Tipo de litigio: Transnacional

Empresas

Glencore Suiza Metales y acero, Minería, Petróleo, gas y carbón
Xstrata Tintaya Perú Minería

Fuentes

Snapshot: In 2015, 22 Indigenous Peruvian environmental activists filed a lawsuit against Xstrata at the London High Court for its alleged involvement in violent protests with two deaths against the company's copper mine. They argue that the company provided financial support to the Peruvian police and logistical aid, equipment, and vehicles, encouraging them to use excessive force against the Tintaya mine protesters. Xstrata denies the allegations and stated that “protection [by the Peruvian police] was necessary…”.

Línea del tiempo