abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

Cette page n’est pas disponible en Français et est affichée en English

Procès bâillon (SLAPP)

1 Déc 2019

Centre national de coopération au développement (CNCD-11.11.1)

Statut : ONGOING

Date de dépôt de la plainte
1 Déc 2019
Exactitude de la date
Année et Mois corrects
Centre national de coopération au développement (CNCD-11.11.1)
Pénal
Non applicable
Groupe de défense de l'environnement
Procès : SLAPP
Demandes en justice: Diffamation
Procès intenté par: Company
Cible: Groupe, Organisation ou Institution
Lieu de dépôt de la plainte: Luxembourg
Lieu de l'incident: Luxembourg
Socfin Luxembourg Caoutchouc, Palmiers et huiles Réponse de l'entreprise

Sources

In December 2019, 4 NGOs and 7 of their employees were called to appear before an investigating judge in Luxembourg following a defamation lawsuit initiated by the agro-industrial multinational SOCFIN. The complaint reportedly came following the publication of a report by human rights NGO FIAN Belgium in Sierra Leone, as well as a series of press releases from the allegedly offending NGOs (11.11.11, CNCD-11.11.11, FIAN Belgium, SOS Faim Belgique, and SOS Faim Luxembourg) and an awareness-raising initiative carried out at the Socfin General Assembly in Luxembourg in May 2019. The latter was aimed at raising public awareness of the situation of the affected communities and at challenging the company's managers. The complaints include calumny, insults, and violation of privacy. In April 2021, the judicial investigation was still ongoing.