abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

Cette page n’est pas disponible en Français et est affichée en English

Le contenu est également disponible dans les langues suivantes: English, 한국어

Affaire

11 Oct 2024

New report: Investigation accuses Boeing of criminal negligence for withholding information prior to Ethiopian Airlines Boeing 737 MAX crash; company did not respond

In the months leading up to the Ethiopian Airline crash in 20219, the manufacturer did not provide critical safety information to the airline’s pilots regarding the flawed control system of the Boeing 737 MAX, despite repeated requests from the operator.

Business and Human Rights Resource Centre reached out to the company for a response, the company did not respond.

According to an investigation by The New York Times, concerns began to surface in late 2018, just weeks after a Lion Air 737 MAX plunged into the sea in Indonesia, killing all 189 people on board. The cause was identified as a malfunction in the aircraft’s Manoeuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS), designed to prevent the plane from stalling. The system erroneously pushed the plane’s nose down, leading to the fatal crash. Ethiopian Airlines, which also operated the same model, became concerned about the safety of its fleet and sought guidance from Boeing. The airline’s chief pilot sent urgent queries to Boeing, requesting detailed instructions on how to handle a similar malfunction in their aircraft. The request was specifically aimed at understanding what to prioritize in the event of multiple simultaneous system failures, including the handling of MCAS. Instead of providing detailed safety procedures, Boeing referred Ethiopian Airlines to a public bulletin issued after the Lion Air crash. While it is unclear whether more detailed guidance from Boeing could have completely prevented the crash, aviation experts agree that the lack of critical safety information likely contributed to the pilots’ inability to regain control of the aircraft. «Any information provided to the Ethiopian pilots, like the one we received, could have made the difference between life and death,» said Dennis Tajer, spokesperson for the Allied Pilots Association. Following the Lion Air crash, Boeing provided comprehensive briefings to U.S. pilots, including those from American Airlines. These sessions included detailed technical discussions about MCAS, covering its interaction with key aircraft systems, and long-term strategies for managing potential failures. However, Ethiopian Airlines did not receive briefings of such depth, creating a stark contrast in how safety information was shared among 737 MAX operators. Emails between Ethiopian Airlines and Boeing, obtained by The New York Times, reveal that the airline’s chief pilot was asking many of the same questions as U.S. pilots, but did not receive the same level of information. The lack of detailed guidance, experts say, left Ethiopian Airlines at a disadvantage and ultimately contributed to the second fatal crash involving the 737 MAX.

Business and Human Rights Resource Centre reached out to the company for a response, the company did not respond.

Réponses de l'entreprise

Boeing

Aucune réponse

Chronologie

Informations sur la confidentialité

Ce site utilise des cookies et d'autres technologies de stockage web. Vous pouvez définir vos choix en matière de confidentialité ci-dessous. Les changements prendront effet immédiatement.

Pour plus d'informations sur notre utilisation du stockage web, veuillez vous référer à notre Politique en matière d'utilisation des données et de cookies

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

Cookie analytique

ON
OFF

Lorsque vous accédez à notre site Web, nous utilisons Google Analytics pour collecter des informations sur votre visite. Autoriser ce cookie nous permettra de comprendre en plus de détails sur votre parcours et d'améliorer la façon dont nous diffusons les informations. Toutes les informations analytiques sont anonymes et nous ne les utilisons pas pour vous identifier. Outre la possibilité que vous avez de refuser des cookies, vous pouvez installer le module pour la désactivation de Google Analytics.

Cookies promotionels

ON
OFF

Nous partageons des nouvelles et des mises à jour sur les entreprises et les droits de l'homme via des plateformes tierces, y compris les médias sociaux et les moteurs de recherche. Ces cookies nous aident à comprendre les performances de ces items.

Vos choix en matière de confidentialité pour ce site

Ce site utilise des cookies et d'autres technologies de stockage web pour améliorer votre expérience au-delà des fonctionnalités de base nécessaires.