"MSHA settles two discrimination cases with Tennessee mine operator", 1 September 2014

The U.S. Department of Labor's Mine Safety and Health Administration announced today that the department has settled two discrimination cases with Nyrstar Tennessee Mines – Gordonsville LLC, which operates the Cumberland and Elmwood/Gordonsville Mines in Smith County, Tenn.

According to the settlement, which was approved by Kenneth R. Andrews, the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission administrative law judge assigned to the case, Nyrstar Gordonsville agreed to pay back wages, front pay and compensatory damages to two miners who were terminated from their jobs at the underground zinc mine, Elmwood/Gordonsville Mine.

In addition, the mine operator is required to pay civil penalties totaling $22,000 for its alleged violations of Section 105(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977.

"All miners have the right to identify hazardous conditions and refuse unsafe work without fear of discrimination or retaliation," said Joseph A. Main, assistant secretary of labor for mine safety and health. "Judge Andrews' decision will help ensure that the workers at these two mines fully understand their rights."

The department's complaint alleged that the miners were terminated after engaging in various forms of protected activity during the first half of 2012, including: making safety complaints to immediate supervisors, the mine's safety department and senior managers; making internal complaints of retaliation to the mine's human resources department and, subsequently, to corporate headquarters; registering with MSHA as a designated representative of miners; assisting MSHA during inspections; being suspected of making hazard complaints to MSHA; filing a prior complaint of retaliation with MSHA; opposing retaliation taken against another miner; and engaging in protected communications with a representative of miners...

According to Section 105(c) of the Mine Act, a miner cannot be discharged, discriminated against or interfered with in the exercise of statutory rights because he or she has engaged in a protected activity, such as filing a complaint alleging a health or safety violation, or refusing to work under unsafe or unhealthy conditions.