abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

이 페이지는 한국어로 제공되지 않으며 English로 표시됩니다.

소송

2020년 1월 1일

Environmental Evaluation Service lawsuit (re Minera Los Pelambres copper mine, Chile)

상태: CLOSED

소송을 제기한 날짜
2020년 1월 1일
날짜 정확도
연도 일치
적용 불가
Community, Human Rights Defender
제소 위치: 칠레
사건 위치: 칠레
소송 유형: 국내

기업 페이지

Grupo Luksic 칠레 식음료, 다각화/대기업, 금융 및 은행, 채굴, 포트, 운송: 일반, 에너지
Mitsubishi Group 일본 식음료, 화학 물질: 일반, 전기 기구, 금융 및 은행, 채굴, 기술, 통신 및 전자 제품, 운송: 일반
Mitsubishi Materials (part of Mitsubishi Group) 일본 금속/플라스틱/기본재료: 일반

Against other:

Government

출처

Snapshot: In 2020, the Caimanes Defense Committee, a group of residents from Caimanes, Chile, filed a lawsuit with the First Environmental Court against the Environmental Evaluation Service (SEA) against Antofacasta Minerals' Minera Los Pelambres copper mine. They alleged that they were not consulted during the Environmental Impact Assessment. The residents claimed that the project adversely affected their quality of life, posing a continuous threat to their right to live in an uncontaminated environment. They sought the invalidation of the SEA's approval of the Environmental Qualification Resolution (RCA) and challenged the rejection of their invalidation request. Additionally, they pointed out irregularities in the public participation process, asserting that the residents were not properly informed or given the opportunity to provide input on the project. The Court rejected the claim, citing the project complied with its obligations to public participation. The Committee filed an appeal against this decision. In 2021, the Committee withdrew its appeal after an agreement was reached between the parties. The case is closed.