abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

이 페이지는 한국어로 제공되지 않으며 English로 표시됩니다.

의견

2024년 1월 17일

저자:
Natalia Daza Niño, BHRRC

COP28 Breakdown: Striving for a just transition amid human rights hurdles

For those promoting a just energy transition, two general developments from COP28 stood out: at the conclusion of the conference, parties committed for the first time to transition away from and reduce their demand for fossil fuels. The final text also evidenced agreement on a common goal, as parties called to triple global renewable energy capacity. This is welcome news in the race against climate change – but the required scope and speed of the deployment of renewable energy assets comes with its own set of human rights challenges.

As revealed by our latest version of the Renewable Energy Benchmark, despite increased efforts by major wind and solar developers - 75% of which have implemented human rights policies - there is still significant progress to be made. Policies and practices on land rights and Indigenous Peoples’ rights remain poor. Worryingly, the sector remains severely exposed to the risk of forced labour in its supply chains - and is still far from doing enough to address it.

The push to triple renewable energies will also drive demand for transition minerals which include - but are not limited to - lithium, copper and bauxite, among others. The extraction of these minerals, as evidenced by our Transition Minerals Tracker, is no stranger to abuses synonymous with the mining industry, including attacks on human rights defenders, which account for a third of all allegations. It is therefore imperative for companies to conduct thorough human rights due diligence to ensure a cleaner energy production which respects and safeguards human rights throughout the supply chain.

In addition, as the UN Secretary General Antonio Guterrez pointed out in his press conference, parties need to make an explicit commitment to a fossil fuel phase-out, rather than simply a promise to transition away from fossil fuels. The latter is problematic because it lacks clarity on when, how, and what this transitioning away looks like, creating a loophole that could allow continued fossil fuel production. Moreover, as finance pledges continue to fall short, it is still unclear how the transitioning away from fossil fuels, along with the tripling of renewable energy, will be financed.

While the final COP decision text contains references to a just transition, Indigenous Peoples and women’s rights, specific issues essential for the process of tripling renewables to uphold human rights, such as shared prosperity, human rights and social protection, and fair negotiations, were left unaddressed.

Work Programme on Just Transition Pathways: Some progress but gaps on human rights and corporate accountability remain

COP28 closed with a decision on the Just Transition Work Programme. To be effective, the Work Programme cannot afford to limit its work solely to dialogues, as currently indicated, but must be sufficiently empowered to deliver strong recommendations.

The decision preamble acknowledges human rights, the right to a clean, safe and healthy environment, the rights of Indigenous Peoples, peoples with disabilities and local communities, and the need to promote gender equity on climate action. However, explicit wording calling for effective participation was eliminated during the last round of negotiations. Echoing calls from business coalitions, close attention must also be given to corporate accountability and responsibility in the context of a just transition.

The influence of the most polluting industries over COP negotiations outcomes must be curtailed.

This year’s COP again welcomed a record number of fossil fuel and gas lobbyists. It also saw an increase in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) lobbyists - successful in their efforts to secure a reference to CSS technologies as part of the climate solutions recognised in the COP’s final decision, despite profound concerns regarding the scientific viability and cost-efficiency of these technologies. This, in addition to the next COP being held in a petrostate for a third year in a row (Azerbaijan) and the controversies around this year’s COP presidency and his business affiliations, reinforces the need for a much stronger conflict-of-interest policy from the UNFCCC, one that is able to safeguard the right to science at these negotiations.

Azerbaijan has appointed Mukhtar Babayev, former executive at the country’s state-owned oil company (SOCAR), as COP29 President, raising new concerns for the next COP. This added to the long-tracked record of human rights abuses from oil and gas companies in Azerbaijan, as evidenced in reports published by the Oil Workers' Rights Protection Organization (2023), and Crude Accountability (2022), among others.

Unaddressed barriers to the right to participation at COP

COP28 was held for the second year in a row in a country with a troubling human rights record, an aspect which critically shaped the way in which civil society raised its demands during the conference. While UN rules themselves are a significant limitation to civic space at the climate conference, having a host country which further limits civil society space makes it even more difficult to guarantee effective participation. Without the UN safeguarding conditions necessary for effective participation to be carried out by civil society, and with COP29 being held for the third time in a row in a country with a shrinking space for civil society, human rights defenders and NGOs will continue to face obstacles to secure their right to participation.

By Natalia Daza Niño, Natural Resources & Just Energy Transition Researcher, BHRRC

개인정보

이 웹사이트는 쿠키 및 기타 웹 저장 기술을 사용합니다. 아래에서 개인정보보호 옵션을 설정할 수 있습니다. 변경 사항은 즉시 적용됩니다.

웹 저장소 사용에 대한 자세한 내용은 다음을 참조하세요 데이터 사용 및 쿠키 정책

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

분석 쿠키

ON
OFF

귀하가 우리 웹사이트를 방문하면 Google Analytics를 사용하여 귀하의 방문 정보를 수집합니다. 이 쿠키를 수락하면 저희가 귀하의 방문에 대한 자세한 내용을 이해하고, 정보 표시 방법을 개선할 수 있습니다. 모든 분석 정보는 익명이 보장되며 귀하를 식별하는데 사용하지 않습니다. Google은 모든 브라우저에 대해 Google Analytics 선택 해제 추가 기능을 제공합니다.

프로모션 쿠키

ON
OFF

우리는 소셜미디어와 검색 엔진을 포함한 제3자 플랫폼을 통해 기업과 인권에 대한 뉴스와 업데이트를 제공합니다. 이 쿠키는 이러한 프로모션의 성과를 이해하는데 도움이 됩니다.

이 사이트에 대한 개인정보 공개 범위 선택

이 사이트는 필요한 핵심 기능 이상으로 귀하의 경험을 향상시키기 위해 쿠키 및 기타 웹 저장 기술을 사용합니다.