abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

이 페이지는 한국어로 제공되지 않으며 English로 표시됩니다.

이 내용은 다음 언어로도 제공됩니다: English, français

기사

2024년 8월 20일

저자:
Didier Makal, Mongabay

In the DRC, a government commission is taking funds owed to people relocated by mines

모든 태그 보기 혐의

After a devastating human toll of 11 dead and several ill due to continued air and river pollution, the village of Kabombwa has definitively disappeared from the map. More than 1,000 residents have found housing elsewhere in the Democratic Republic of Congo’s (DRC) province of Lualaba, including in the neighboring mining town of Fungurume.

Kabombwa’s tranquility had begun fading away in 2020 when lime production began at a nearby plant operated by the Chinese company Tenke Fungurume Mining SA (TFM). According to an official from Fungurume town hall, after over a year of discussions about financial compensation, the inhabitants of Kabombwa received between $3,000 and $5,000 from the government when they were relocated. But for the village’s inhabitants, the amount is far from sufficient. It isn’t enough to buy a house or build a new one in their new villages.

One reason for the insufficient compensation is the provincial government’s administrative process, civil society organizations tell Mongabay.

More precisely due to the Relocation Commission (Commission de délocalisations), a body created by the provincial government of Lualaba to oversee evictions and relocation. This commission ends up taking a percentage of the total funds owed to relocated people. Mining companies, on their end, rarely get involved in the dispute after paying the sum, leaving the government to manage compensating those affected.

Unfair compensation has become a pattern in mining relocations in Lualaba, a province with large deposits of copper and cobalt, two essential minerals for phones, computers and renewable energy technologies. The rush for these precious minerals has caused local residents to fear not only relocation itself but also relocation under unfair circumstances.

How is compensation received? First, the Relocation Commission conducts an appraisal to determine the value of relocated people’s property. The commission is made up of government officials, deputies, members of civil society, and land technicians. After the appraisal, the mining company makes its payments...

The Relocation Commission, however, receives 10% of the total cost of payments to be made to relocated people, sources explain...this percentage is to fund its operations and its members’ remuneration.

Ten percent of the total amount to be distributed is therefore missing when it reaches beneficiaries. When communities speak of unfair compensation in circumstances such as these, the private companies take no responsibility. Yet they paid 10% of the total amount due to the commission’s technicians, complain civil society organizations.

This means that those who are being relocated are the ones financing the expertise leading to their relocation, Kalenga says.

According to both the Mining Code as well as the Mining Regulations (Annex 18), the holder of the mining rights, thus the mining company, is the party responsible for relocating people exposed to the mining’s harmful effects. This would suggest that the mining company therefore assumes the total cost, including an extra 10% commission, and not the beneficiaries.

For example, in Tshabula, a village near the city of Musonoïe in Kolwezi, and Kakanda, a village near Fungurume, farmers are waiting to be resettled by the mining companies COMMUS [Joint venture between Zijin Mining and Gécamines] and Boss Mining, a subsidiary of Eurasian Natural Resources PLC. Despite the state’s investment in the process, dissatisfaction prevails. Each relocation sees the demand for more funds for property that people say is undervalued, such as houses and fruit trees.

However, according to Christophe Kabwik, an activist who has long defended the inhabitants of Kalukuluku, a village near the Ruashi Mine east of the city of Lubumbashi, mining companies don’t like to organize resettlement for people who have to leave their mining sites. Kabwik believes the reason to be that mining companies prefer to pay less by giving cash rather than building new houses. In 2006, with assistance from the city’s deputy mayor, Ruashi Mining rejected the option of resettling some 200 people who had requested relocation...

타임라인

개인정보

이 웹사이트는 쿠키 및 기타 웹 저장 기술을 사용합니다. 아래에서 개인정보보호 옵션을 설정할 수 있습니다. 변경 사항은 즉시 적용됩니다.

웹 저장소 사용에 대한 자세한 내용은 다음을 참조하세요 데이터 사용 및 쿠키 정책

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

분석 쿠키

ON
OFF

귀하가 우리 웹사이트를 방문하면 Google Analytics를 사용하여 귀하의 방문 정보를 수집합니다. 이 쿠키를 수락하면 저희가 귀하의 방문에 대한 자세한 내용을 이해하고, 정보 표시 방법을 개선할 수 있습니다. 모든 분석 정보는 익명이 보장되며 귀하를 식별하는데 사용하지 않습니다. Google은 모든 브라우저에 대해 Google Analytics 선택 해제 추가 기능을 제공합니다.

프로모션 쿠키

ON
OFF

우리는 소셜미디어와 검색 엔진을 포함한 제3자 플랫폼을 통해 기업과 인권에 대한 뉴스와 업데이트를 제공합니다. 이 쿠키는 이러한 프로모션의 성과를 이해하는데 도움이 됩니다.

이 사이트에 대한 개인정보 공개 범위 선택

이 사이트는 필요한 핵심 기능 이상으로 귀하의 경험을 향상시키기 위해 쿠키 및 기타 웹 저장 기술을 사용합니다.