abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

이 페이지는 한국어로 제공되지 않으며 English로 표시됩니다.

기사

2013년 4월 17일

저자:
Marcia Coyle, National Law Journal [USA]

Justices Limit Reach of Alien Tort Law [USA]

The U.S. Supreme Court…sharply limited the reach of a federal law used to hold corporations and others accountable for human rights abuses committed abroad. But human rights lawyers predicted additional litigation over how much of the federal courthouse door was left ajar. Writing for the Court in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. said the presumption against the extraterritorial application of federal laws applies to the…Alien Tort Statute (ATS)…The immediate impact of the ruling is to shut down the Kiobel case in the federal courts…In an opinion concurring in the judgment, Justice Stephen Breyer wrote that he would find jurisdiction under the law where: the alleged tort occurs on American soil; the defendant is an American national, or the defendant's conduct substantially and adversely affects an important American national interest.

다음 타임라인의 일부

Marcia Coyle analyses US Supreme Court Kiobel v. Shell Alien Tort Statute decision

Shell lawsuit (re executions in Nigeria, Kiobel v Shell, filed in USA)