abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

Esta página não está disponível em Português e está sendo exibida em English

Ação judicial

1 Jan 2020

Environmental Evaluation Service lawsuit (re Minera Los Pelambres copper mine, Chile)

Status: CLOSED

Data em que a ação judicial foi iniciada
1 Jan 2020
Precisão da data
Ano Correto
Não aplicável
Comunidade, Defensor dos Direitos Humanos
Local de Arquivamento: Chile
Localização do Incidente: Chile
Tipo de litígio: Doméstico

Empresas

Grupo Luksic Chile Alimentos e Bebidas, Diversificados/ Conglomerados, Finanças e Bancos, Mineração, Portos, Transporte: geral, Energia
Mitsubishi Group Japão Alimentos e Bebidas, Químicos: geral, Eletrodomésticos, Finanças e Bancos, Mineração, Tecnologia, telecomunicações e eletrônicos, Transporte: geral
Mitsubishi Materials (part of Mitsubishi Group) Japão Metais/plásticos/materiais básicos: Geral

Against other:

Government

Fontes

Snapshot: In 2020, the Caimanes Defense Committee, a group of residents from Caimanes, Chile, filed a lawsuit with the First Environmental Court against the Environmental Evaluation Service (SEA) against Antofacasta Minerals' Minera Los Pelambres copper mine. They alleged that they were not consulted during the Environmental Impact Assessment. The residents claimed that the project adversely affected their quality of life, posing a continuous threat to their right to live in an uncontaminated environment. They sought the invalidation of the SEA's approval of the Environmental Qualification Resolution (RCA) and challenged the rejection of their invalidation request. Additionally, they pointed out irregularities in the public participation process, asserting that the residents were not properly informed or given the opportunity to provide input on the project. The Court rejected the claim, citing the project complied with its obligations to public participation. The Committee filed an appeal against this decision. In 2021, the Committee withdrew its appeal after an agreement was reached between the parties. The case is closed.