The Supreme Court on Thursday threw out a lawsuit alleging that the food companies Nestle and Cargill aided and abetted child slavery in the Ivory Coast.

The court ruled in a 8-1 decision that the lawsuit from alleged former slaves at cocoa farms in the West African nation should be dismissed because U.S. courts don't have jurisdiction over their allegations.

The majority opinion was authored by Justice Clarence Thomas. Justice Samuel Alito was the lone dissenter.

Thomas said in his opinion that the lawsuit did not establish an adequate connection to conduct within the U.S. to qualify under the 1789 Alien Tort Statute, which allows foreigners to bring certain suits in U.S. courts...

Paul Hoffman, an attorney representing the plaintiffs, said he was disappointed in the court's decision with respect to their specific allegations but encouraged that at least some of the justices appear to believe that corporations do not enjoy any special immunity from such suits.

"We are disappointed that the Court read our allegations as claiming general corporate oversight by these companies over their Ivory Coast operations," Hoffman said in an email. "We believe that the companies are more deeply involved in the system of child slavery in that country. We will be able to amend our complaint to address the Court's standard."

A Nestle spokesperson said in an emailed statement that child labor is "unacceptable."

"That is why we are working so hard to prevent it," the spokesperson added. "Today, the Supreme Court agreed there is no basis for this lawsuit to proceed against Nestlé. Nestlé never engaged in the egregious child labor alleged in this suit, and we remain unwavering in our dedication to combatting child labor in the cocoa industry and to our ongoing work with partners in government, NGOs and industry to tackle this complex, global issue."...