[See page 62:] The Board recommends a vote “ AGAINST ”Proposal 4. The Company is committed to supporting and maintaining the highest standards of ethical conduct and respect for human rights. Our Code of Business Conduct, or our Code, articulates our standards for integrity and respect for our customers, our co-workers and third-parties alike...The Company does not prevent any of its employees from supporting, organizing or joining a union, and it prohibits discrimination and retaliation against such individuals. We believe the three union-sponsored reports that are the source of the criticism at the core of the stockholder proposal are inaccurate and without merit and do not justify the cost and effort of the proposed human rights risk assessment...The proposed human rights risk assessment is unnecessary in light of the Company’s demonstrated and independently verified commitment to human rights and ethical conduct. The proposal represents a diversion of resources and a duplication of effort with no corresponding benefit to the Company or its stockholders, employees or customers.