abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

Эта страница недоступна на Русский и отображается на English

Статья

8 Фев 2012

Автор:
Angela Saini, in Guardian "Comment is Free" blog

Internet censorship could damage India's democracy

См. все теги
The problem is, unlike the domestic media, internet companies are fairly easy pickings. Should they cross the line, they can be banned – instantly losing out on one of Asia's biggest and most lucrative markets. The equation is simple, and everyone knows it: Google is more likely to kowtow to the government than risk abandoning a cash cow like India. Taking down a few objectionable web pages now is the rational economic choice...16 journalists have been murdered in India since 1992...They were willing to put their lives on the line. Google, Facebook, Twitter … what are you willing to do?

Хронология