abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

Bu sayfa Türkçe dilinde mevcut değildir ve şu an English dilinde görüntülenmektedir

Dava (Toplum Katılımını Engellemeye Yönelik Stratejik Davalar (SLAPP)

1 Ara 2019

11.11.11 vecht tegen onrecht (fight against injustice)

Durum: ONGOING

Davanın açıldığı tarih
1 Ara 2019
Tarih doğruluğu
Yıl ve Ay Doğru
11.11.11 vecht tegen onrecht (fight against injustice)
Ceza
Uygun değil
Çevresel kaygılar grubu
Davalar: SLAPP'ler
Yasal iddialar: Karalama
Davayı Açan: Company
Hedef: Grup, Organizasyon veya Kurum
Davanın Açıldığı Yer: Lüksemburg
Olayın Gerçekleştiği Yer: Lüksemburg
Socfin Lüksemburg Kauçuk, Palmiye ağaçları ve yağ Şirketin Yanıtı

Kaynaklar

In December 2019, 4 NGOs and 7 of their employees were called to appear before an investigating judge in Luxembourg following a defamation lawsuit initiated by the agro-industrial multinational SOCFIN. The complaint reportedly came following the publication of a report by human rights NGO FIAN Belgium in Sierra Leone, as well as a series of press releases from the allegedly offending NGOs (11.11.11, CNCD-11.11.11, FIAN Belgium, SOS Faim Belgique, and SOS Faim Luxembourg) and an awareness-raising initiative carried out at the Socfin General Assembly in Luxembourg in May 2019. The latter was aimed at raising public awareness of the situation of the affected communities and at challenging the company's managers. The complaints include calumny, insults, and violation of privacy. In April 2021, the judicial investigation was still ongoing.