abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

Bu sayfa Türkçe dilinde mevcut değildir ve şu an English dilinde görüntülenmektedir

Dava (Toplum Katılımını Engellemeye Yönelik Stratejik Davalar (SLAPP)

31 May 2016

Greenpeace Fund Inc.

Durum: DISMISSED

Davanın açıldığı tarih
31 May 2016
Tarih doğruluğu
Tümü Doğru
Greenpeace Fund Inc.
Medeni
Uygun değil
Çevresel kaygılar grubu
Davalar: SLAPP'ler
Davacının avukatı: Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP
Yasal iddialar: Karalama, Şantaj, Haksız müdahale, Marka
Zarar miktarı: $300,000,000
Davayı Açan: Company
Hedef: Grup, Organizasyon veya Kurum
Davanın Açıldığı Yer: Amerika Birleşik Devletleri
Olayın Gerçekleştiği Yer: Amerika Birleşik Devletleri
Resolute Forest Products Kanada Tomruk ve kereste, Kağıt ve karton Şirketin Yanıtı
Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP Amerika Birleşik Devletleri Hukuk firmaları Şirketin Yanıtı

Kaynaklar

On May 31, 2016, Resolute Forest Products (“Resolute”) filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia against Greenpeace International, Greenpeace Inc., Greenpeace Fund Inc., STAND.earth (formerly ForestEthics), and five individual staff members of these organizations. The complaint included federal racketeering claims, trademark, defamation, and tortious interference claims under Georgia law (the case was later transferred to the US District Court for the Northern District of California). Resolute alleged that the defendants misrepresented facts in order to induce donations, and used false claims to “extort” Resolute customers. Resolute claimed at least $300,000,000 in damages. On October 16, 2017, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed all of the logging company’s claims with leave to amend. The court also awarded the defendants their attorneys’ fees pursuant to the California anti-SLAPP statute. Resolute filed a repackaged version of its original complaint three weeks later. On January 22, 2019. the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed all claims under RICO and most of the state law claims (claims related to 294 of the 296 statements at issue). The case was dismissed in full against STAND.earth, Greenpeace Fund, and two individual defendants.