abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

这页面没有简体中文版本,现以English显示

文章

18 四月 2023

Submission by the Office of the Compliance Advisor Ombudsman (CAO) to consultation on IFC/MIGA remedial action approach

IFC/MIGA’s consultation draft sets out multiple ideas for enhancing IFC and MIGA practice. However, it falls short of proposing a robust framework that can effectively meet the challenge of bringing about remedy for harms suffered by people impacted by IFC/MIGA projects. To bridge this gap, CAO recommends that IFC/MIGA revise the draft Approach in ways that: 

  • Clearly establish IFC/MIGA’s responsibility to contribute to remedy when they have contributed to harm. 
  • Apply remedy enhancements to all relevant projects unless there is a compelling reason not to, rather than to select projects as currently proposed. 
  • Replace tentative and vague language in the draft with a clear, actionable plan setting out concrete, time-bound and measurable commitments. 
  • Include a commitment and a work plan to ensure that project-affected people receive accessible information about their grievance redress options, including access to CAO. 
  • Address how remedy will be pursued in portfolio projects and CAO cases; and commit to include remedy planning in both Board and project documents going forward.

In addition, the revised Approach should directly respond to the recommendations of the 2020 External Review of IFC/MIGA’s E&S Accountability, Including CAO’s Role and Effectiveness, which was initiated by the IFC and MIGA Boards of Executive Directors (the Board). This is critical since the External Review findings (summarized below) triggered the IFC/MIGA’s decision to develop an enhanced approach to remedy. Moreover, CAO recommends that the revised Approach take into account, and build on, CAO’s analysis of the reasons for the current lack of remedy for IFC/MIGA project-related harms and how the proposed enhancements respond to these root causes.

Under the current timeline, IFC and MIGA will consider feedback from stakeholders in developing a Management Directive for the new Approach’s pilot phase. CAO recommends that they first provide a process for further stakeholder feedback on the revised Approach. This would help ensure full transparency and a robust outcome that reestablishes IFC/MIGA leadership in this space.


NB: The CAO has issued several recent advisory publications related to remedy, which are available here and include:

时间线

隐私资讯

本网站使用 cookie 和其他网络存储技术。您可以在下方设置您的隐私选项。您所作的更改将立即生效。

有关我们使用网络存储的更多信息,请参阅我们的 数据使用和 Cookie 政策

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

分析 cookie

ON
OFF

您浏览本网页时我们将以Google Analytics收集信息。接受此cookie将有助我们理解您的浏览资讯,并协助我们改善呈现资讯的方法。所有分析资讯都以匿名方式收集,我们并不能用相关资讯得到您的个人信息。谷歌在所有主要浏览器中都提供退出Google Analytics的添加应用程式。

市场营销cookies

ON
OFF

我们从第三方网站获得企业责任资讯,当中包括社交媒体和搜寻引擎。这些cookie协助我们理解相关浏览数据。

您在此网站上的隐私选项

本网站使用cookie和其他网络存储技术来增强您在必要核心功能之外的体验。