abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

这页面没有简体中文版本,现以English显示

法律诉讼

2024年1月1日

US Interior Department and Bureau of Land Management lawsuit (re SunZia wind energy project, USA)

状态: ONGOING

提诉日期
2024年1月1日
日期准确度
年份和月份正确
不适用
原住民, 人权捍卫者, NGO
申诉地点: 美国
事发地点: 美国
诉讼类型: Domestic

企业

Pattern Energy 美国 太阳能, 風能

Against other:

Government

Sources

Snapshot: In January 2024, Native American tribes, including the Tohono O'odham, Hopi, Zuni, and San Carlos Apache Tribe, along with the Center for Biological Diversity and Archaeology Southwest, filed a lawsuit against the US Interior Department and the Bureau of Land Management with the US District Court for the District of Arizona. They challenged the approval of the $10 billion SunZia-operated transmission line intended to carry wind-generated energy from New Mexico to other states across the US. They argued that the Bureau had failed to fulfil its obligations to identify historic sites and that the project would cause irreversible damage to the land ecologically and culturally. They asked the Court to issue an injunction to halt the construction. In April 2024, the court rejected their demands, citing that the plaintiffs filed their claims too late and the Bureau had already fulfilled its obligations to identify historic sites. The plaintiffs appealed. On 6 June 2024, a US District Judge dismissed the claims on the same grounds. The environmentalists are likely to appeal. In April 2024, they asked a US federal Court of Appeals to intervene in their case.