abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

这页面没有简体中文版本,现以English显示

内容有以下的语言版本: English, español, français

评论文章

2023年10月20日

作者:
Feminists for a Binding Treaty

Five reasons the Binding Treaty needs to be feminist

Feminists for a Binding Treaty

For the past nine years, every October, the UN Intergovernmental Working Group on transnational corporations, States and civil society organisations have met in Geneva to engage in debate around an urgent issue — the need for a binding treaty to address human rights violations by corporations across the world.

In just a few days, they will meet again to negotiate a text that could empower those affected by corporate abuses to claim their rights and obtain justice. Ahead of this session, here are five reasons we believe the process and the legally binding instrument need to be feminist in order to be effective:

  1. Women bear the burden of multiple crises: Food insecurity, climate change and corporate abuse impact women more heavily, through multiple forms of discrimination. As one example, rural, indigenous women are especially at risk. Women are also more vulnerable to sexual harassment, exploitation, trafficking and other types of violence.
  2. Women lack a seat at the table: Decision-making can either make or break women’s livelihoods, health, communities and futures. Particularly in developing countries, women are most vulnerable to the effects of neoliberal economic policies. Research shows women’s participation in decision-making leads to better outcomes for everyone. Yet, the voices, participation and leadership of women collectively organising for their rights in supply chains and women human rights defenders are actively suppressed.
  3. Women work more, but are paid less: They tend to earn less, have fewer savings and bear the burden of unpaid care work and domestic work. They are also more likely to work in the informal sector due to often needing flexible work to fit around their care responsibilities and a lack of access to better jobs and opportunities. This poverty trap leaves them exposed to violence, exploitation, forced labour and other forms of modern slavery. In the formal sector, women generally receive lower wages, fewer promotions and are underrepresented in decision-making.
  4. Gender justice is central to climate justice: In the midst of a climate crisis, policies holding businesses accountable for exploiting the environment and contributing to rising greenhouse gas emissions are long overdue. Women and girls are at the heart of climate justice, including in their fundamental role as environmental defenders. They are also key to building climate resilience. Moreover, the takeover of natural resources and land grabbing by corporations in mining and extractive industries hits women the hardest due to their roles of managing food, water, energy needs and care needs. By impeding women’s access to essential resources, they thereby impact their livelihoods, health and safety.
  5. Real guarantees for justice are the need of the hour: We know that women, gender-diverse people and marginalised communities pay the highest price when corporations violate human rights. It is high time the rights of people experiencing intersecting vulnerabilities – be it people of colour, Indigenous communities or those living in conflict – are protected. Corporate abuse disproportionately impacts several groups, including LGBTQIA+ people and persons with disabilities. A strong human rights framework will translate into real, actionable regulations and accessible remedies.

Views from a feminist lens

How could a feminist binding treaty help further these goals? We advocate for the Binding Treaty framework to prioritise non-discrimination and substantive equality. This looks like women from diverse backgrounds and communities being respected, heard and included. Rather than being positioned retrospectively as passive victims of human rights violations, they need to be at the centre of developing policies and regulations for businesses.

Further, protections and remedies need to be specific in addressing systemic and structural inequalities, compounded over the years. The actions of businesses and the lack of comprehensive and specific regulation of these impacts have caused and aggravated such discrimination. The Treaty process presents an opportunity for States to reaffirm the primacy of human rights and the safeguarding of their human rights obligations.

Gender analysis is critical to acknowledge and account for these differential impacts of business activities on people with intersecting identities. Our feminist analysis supports a vision of socio-economic justice for all, through concrete steps towards the long-delayed regulation of business activities. Measures for accountability must include human rights, as well as the protection of the environment.

If the Binding Treaty is to really make a difference, it should consider the specific challenges faced by women, gender-diverse people and their communities in the face of corporate abuses. In doing so, it must also engage their leadership in defending human rights and the environment and achieving social transformation. Now, more than ever, we need a feminist Binding Treaty that holds businesses accountable, and therein, puts people before profit.

By Feminists for a Binding Treaty, a coalition of over 30 human rights organisations, representing a large and diverse network of women’s lived experiences, shared analysis and expertise from around the world in the process for a Binding Treaty. #Feminists4BindingTreaty.

More on the Binding Treaty

Webinar series: Bridging the gap

Together with Centre for Applied Legal Studies, The International Commission of Jurists, Justica Ambiental, Lawyers for Human Rights and the Zimbabwe Environmental Law Association, we convened a series of three webinars in July, August and September 2023 to foster debate around critical issues in the development of the Binding Treaty. Watch the recordings here.

UN Intergovernmental Working Group releases updated draft of legally binding instrument on business and human rights

An updated draft of the legally binding instrument was released in July 2023 ahead of the ninth session of the open-ended intergovernmental working group on transnational corporations and other business enterprises with respect to human rights.

Binding Treaty portal

Read about the latest developments on the Binding Treaty.

Building momentum: Critical considerations in the Binding Treaty 2023 negotiations

评论文章

Reclaiming states’ economic sovereignty: the crux of the new treaty on business and human rights

Olivier De Schutter, UN Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights 2023年10月24日

评论文章

Building momentum to negotiate a stronger binding business and human rights treaty for all

Elodie Aba, Senior Legal Researcher, Business and Human Rights Resource Centre 2023年10月16日

View Full Series

隐私资讯

本网站使用 cookie 和其他网络存储技术。您可以在下方设置您的隐私选项。您所作的更改将立即生效。

有关我们使用网络存储的更多信息,请参阅我们的 数据使用和 Cookie 政策

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

分析 cookie

ON
OFF

您浏览本网页时我们将以Google Analytics收集信息。接受此cookie将有助我们理解您的浏览资讯,并协助我们改善呈现资讯的方法。所有分析资讯都以匿名方式收集,我们并不能用相关资讯得到您的个人信息。谷歌在所有主要浏览器中都提供退出Google Analytics的添加应用程式。

市场营销cookies

ON
OFF

我们从第三方网站获得企业责任资讯,当中包括社交媒体和搜寻引擎。这些cookie协助我们理解相关浏览数据。

您在此网站上的隐私选项

本网站使用cookie和其他网络存储技术来增强您在必要核心功能之外的体验。