abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

这页面没有简体中文版本,现以English显示

评论文章

2024年9月20日

作者:
Antonina Scheer - LSE

Unjust minerals: What can investors do to drive the changes needed for a just transition in the mining sector?

Shutterstock (licensed)

The economic transformation needed to reach net zero emissions is precipitating a fall in demand for coal and setting off a dramatic acceleration in demand for energy transition minerals (ETMs). Both these processes involve important social impacts and opportunities. The decline of the coal sector will impact the livelihoods and regional economies that are dependent on it. Meanwhile, companies building new ETM mines must resolve the tension between expanding mineral production for global climate action and the protection of local people and ecosystems affected by mining. Worryingly, the global mining sector has a poor track record on human rights and environmental harm. To reduce the substantial social and environmental impacts of mining, mineral demand must be firmly managed and existing responsible mining laws and standards strengthened. Given the speed of the low-carbon transition needed to hold the global temperature increase to 1.5°C, action to make mining more responsible must take place in a time-bound and rapidly-evolving context.

Large investments are needed to build new mines but also to improve all mines to strictly align with best practice on harm reduction. Meanwhile, many asset owners and asset managers have announced net zero targets and just transition commitments. What role can they play in shifting the mining sector towards more sustainable and equitable practices?

Recognising the role of mining on the road to net zero, the UN Secretary General convened a Panel on Critical Energy Transition Minerals, which recently released a set of principles and recommendations to embed justice in the race to net zero emissions. The panel’s fifth principle calls for investments, finance and trade to be responsible and fair. Among the actionable recommendations, there are a number of calls to action for the financial sector. The panel recommends establishing an expert advisory group to accelerate benefit-sharing, economic diversification and responsible investment; a global traceability framework for due diligence and corporate accountability; and better financial assurance mechanisms for mine closures. Importantly, the panel also calls for concrete targets and timelines for material efficiency to manage the growth in global demand for minerals.

The scale and complexity of managing the mining sector’s transformations requires informed and proactive investor participation. In our recent report, we explore this challenge and set out a framework to help investors fulfil their role in aligning mining with just transition goals.

A just transition agenda for investors focused on mining would build on three priorities: respecting communities, protecting workers and developing local economies. With its vast impacts on land, mining must respect local communities, in particular through securing the free, prior and informed consent of Indigenous Peoples for its activities. These priorities are by no means new issues for the mining sector; they form part of its social licence to operate. But the scale and speed of change required to achieve climate goals in ways that also benefit people mean that all actors, including investors, need to explicitly place just transition considerations at the centre.

The spheres of impact relevant to investors are shaped by their interactions with the entities they invest in. Investors can hold equity shares in mining companies, and they can also hold the debt of sovereign governments or state-owned enterprises (SOEs). We developed a framework to illustrate how investor leverage points like dialogue and capital allocation can be used to encourage different entities to align with a just transition. As part of their own environmental and human rights due diligence, investors can pressure mining companies to develop robust access to remedy mechanisms and implement responsible mining standards such as the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA). Such pressure can be applied during shareholder engagement meetings as well as through resolutions and voting at Annual General Meetings.

With governments, investors can advocate for stricter regulations and enforcement for responsible mining alongside policies that manage mineral demand, like public transport and circular economy mandates. They can influence SOEs operating in the mining sector through dialogue during bond roadshows and broader sovereign engagement with governments.

Interactions within supply chains between mining companies and the businesses that use minerals to manufacture end goods offer further opportunities for influence. For example, shareholders of an electric vehicle manufacturer can set expectations for the development of robust human rights and environmental procurement criteria for purchased minerals.

A framework of investor leverage points to drive a just transition in mining

To harness these levers, investors need a range of tools, both to understand best practice and to gather data. Robust responsibility standards, especially those with multi-stakeholder governance structures such as the IRMA, can help set aspirational criteria. Examining evidence of actual harm from irresponsible practices is a crucial complement; this is facilitated by databases such as the Transition Minerals Tracker. In combination, high-integrity standards and detailed records of harms can help investors to build data-informed engagement strategies with mining companies. Taking forward the principles and recommendations of the UN Secretary General’s Panel on Critical Energy Transition Minerals, the financial sector has a mandate to drive action by mining companies and governments towards a just transition.

Antonina Scheer - Policy Fellow – Research Project Manager | Transition Pathway Initiative Centre (TPI Centre) and Associate at the Just Transition Finance Lab | Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment | London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)

隐私资讯

本网站使用 cookie 和其他网络存储技术。您可以在下方设置您的隐私选项。您所作的更改将立即生效。

有关我们使用网络存储的更多信息,请参阅我们的 数据使用和 Cookie 政策

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

分析 cookie

ON
OFF

您浏览本网页时我们将以Google Analytics收集信息。接受此cookie将有助我们理解您的浏览资讯,并协助我们改善呈现资讯的方法。所有分析资讯都以匿名方式收集,我们并不能用相关资讯得到您的个人信息。谷歌在所有主要浏览器中都提供退出Google Analytics的添加应用程式。

市场营销cookies

ON
OFF

我们从第三方网站获得企业责任资讯,当中包括社交媒体和搜寻引擎。这些cookie协助我们理解相关浏览数据。

您在此网站上的隐私选项

本网站使用cookie和其他网络存储技术来增强您在必要核心功能之外的体验。