abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

这页面没有简体中文版本,现以English显示

文章

2024年3月7日

作者:
Edie

Fashion brands making little to no progress on social and environmental accountability, according to Fashion Accountability 2024 Report

"Report: Fashion brands make no progress on social and environmental accountability", March 7 2024

Remake World’s Fashion Accountability report ... analysed 52 major fashion companies, including Patagonia, H&M Group, SKIMS, Ralph Lauren and Reformation ...

....no significant improvements [were] observed in critical areas such as traceability, wages and wellbeing, commercial practices and sustainability governance.

[...]

The report highlights that only 6% of companies, including H&M Group and Burberry, have met all four of Remake World’s climate demands....

While a few companies have taken steps to integrate social and environmental metrics into executive bonuses, the overall pace of change remains sluggish.

According to the report, only a handful of brands, including Inditex, Kering, Nike, PUMA and Ralph Lauren, have begun addressing governance issues by including specific metrics in calculating executive bonuses.

.... the report highlights that waste resulting from ‘fast fashion’ often ends up in landfills or incinerators, disproportionately impacting countries in the Global South such as Chile and Ghana ...

...none of the companies assessed have yet committed to reduce or even stabilise the number of garments they produce each year, as per the report.

...the fashion industry ... has yet to accept responsibility for mitigating the effects of climate disasters on fashion-producing hubs and the garment workers who make its products.

[...]

....no company assessed currently incorporates responsible exit commitments in its contracts with suppliers, nor do they demonstrate that the prices they pay support fair wages. Additionally, only two companies, HanesBrands Inc. and MUJI, include detailed responsible sourcing timeline considerations in their order planning.

[...]

....only a select few among the major companies assessed in the report, including Adidas, ASOS, H&M Group, Nike and Primark, have expressed support for the [EU's Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD)] ...

[...]

The report urges major brands and retailers to actively support legislation and binding agreements that hold companies accountable for their human rights and environmental impacts.

[...]

隐私资讯

本网站使用 cookie 和其他网络存储技术。您可以在下方设置您的隐私选项。您所作的更改将立即生效。

有关我们使用网络存储的更多信息,请参阅我们的 数据使用和 Cookie 政策

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

分析 cookie

ON
OFF

您浏览本网页时我们将以Google Analytics收集信息。接受此cookie将有助我们理解您的浏览资讯,并协助我们改善呈现资讯的方法。所有分析资讯都以匿名方式收集,我们并不能用相关资讯得到您的个人信息。谷歌在所有主要浏览器中都提供退出Google Analytics的添加应用程式。

市场营销cookies

ON
OFF

我们从第三方网站获得企业责任资讯,当中包括社交媒体和搜寻引擎。这些cookie协助我们理解相关浏览数据。

您在此网站上的隐私选项

本网站使用cookie和其他网络存储技术来增强您在必要核心功能之外的体验。