Hannaford’s hotline fails farmworkers
摘要
日期: 2023年6月26日
地点: 美国
企业
Ahold Delhaize - Other Value Chain Entity , Hannaford (part of Ahold Delhaize) - Buyer受影响的
受影响的总人数: 数字未知
工人: ( 数字未知 - 地点未知 , 农业和畜牧 , Gender not reported )议题
Precarious/Unsuitable Living Conditions , Occupational Health & Safety , 殴打和暴力 , Harassment (other than sexual) , Dismissal , 恐吓和威胁回应
已邀请回应:是,由The Resource Centre
载有回应的故事: (查看更多)
后续行动: None reported. The Resource Centre asked Hannaford and its parent company Ahold Delhazie to respond to the allegations. Their response can be read in full.
信息来源: News outlet
摘要
日期: 2023年6月21日
地点: 美国
企业
Ahold Delhaize - Other Value Chain Entity , Hannaford (part of Ahold Delhaize) - Buyer受影响的
受影响的总人数: 数字未知
工人: ( 数字未知 - 地点未知 , 农业和畜牧 , Gender not reported )议题
Precarious/Unsuitable Living Conditions , Occupational Health & Safety , 恐吓和威胁回应
已邀请回应:是,由The Resource Centre
载有回应的故事: (查看更多)
后续行动: None reported. The Resource Centre asked Hannaford and its parent company Ahold Delhazie to respond to the allegations. Their response can be read in full.
信息来源: News outlet
摘要
日期: 2023年6月21日
地点: 美国
企业
Hannaford (part of Ahold Delhaize) - Buyer , Ahold Delhaize - Other Value Chain Entity受影响的
受影响的总人数: 数字未知
工人: ( 数字未知 - 地点未知 , 农业和畜牧 , Gender not reported )议题
童工 , Occupational Health & Safety , Reasonable Working Hours & Leisure Time , Denial of leave , 药物可及性 , Wage Theft回应
已邀请回应:是,由The Resource Centre
载有回应的故事: (查看更多)
后续行动: None reported. The Resource Centre asked Hannaford and its parent company Ahold Delhazie to respond to the allegations. Their response can be read in full.
信息来源: News outlet
摘要
日期: 2023年6月21日
地点: 美国
企业
Hannaford (part of Ahold Delhaize) - Buyer , Ahold Delhaize - Other Value Chain Entity受影响的
受影响的总人数: 数字未知
工人: ( 数字未知 - 地点未知 , 农业和畜牧 , Gender not reported )议题
Precarious/Unsuitable Living Conditions , Occupational Health & Safety , 种族/民族/阶层/出身歧视回应
已邀请回应:是,由The Resource Centre
载有回应的故事: (查看更多)
后续行动: None reported. The Resource Centre asked Hannaford and its parent company Ahold Delhazie to respond to the allegations. Their response can be read in full.
信息来源: News outlet
摘要
日期: 2023年6月21日
地点: 美国
企业
Ahold Delhaize - Other Value Chain Entity , Hannaford (part of Ahold Delhaize) - Buyer受影响的
受影响的总人数: 数字未知
工人: ( 数字未知 - 地点未知 , 农业和畜牧 , Gender not reported )议题
Occupational Health & Safety , 受伤 , 药物可及性回应
已邀请回应:是,由The Resource Centre
载有回应的故事: (查看更多)
后续行动: None reported. The Resource Centre asked Hannaford and its parent company Ahold Delhazie to respond to the allegations. Their response can be read in full.
信息来源: News outlet
摘要
日期: 2023年6月21日
地点: 美国
企业
Ahold Delhaize - Other Value Chain Entity , Hannaford (part of Ahold Delhaize) - Buyer受影响的
受影响的总人数: 数字未知
工人: ( 数字未知 - 地点未知 , 农业和畜牧 , Gender not reported )议题
Precarious/Unsuitable Living Conditions , Occupational Health & Safety , Denial of leave , Wage Theft回应
Response sought: 是
载有回应的故事: (查看更多)
后续行动: None reported. The Resource Centre asked Hannaford and its parent company Ahold Delhazie to respond to the allegations. Their response can be read in full.
信息来源: News outlet
摘要
日期: 2023年6月21日
地点: 美国
企业
Ahold Delhaize - Other Value Chain Entity , Hannaford (part of Ahold Delhaize) - Buyer受影响的
受影响的总人数: 数字未知
工人: ( 数字未知 - 地点未知 , 农业和畜牧 , Gender not reported )议题
隐私 , Wage Theft , Access to Non-Judicial Remedy , Precarious/Unsuitable Living Conditions , Reasonable Working Hours & Leisure Time , 恐吓和威胁 , Occupational Health & Safety回应
已邀请回应:是,由The Resource Centre
载有回应的故事: (查看更多)
后续行动: None reported. The Resource Centre asked Hannaford and its parent company Ahold Delhazie to respond to the allegations. Their response can be read in full.
信息来源: News outlet
摘要
日期: 2023年6月21日
地点: 美国
企业
Ahold Delhaize - Buyer , Hannaford (part of Ahold Delhaize) - Buyer受影响的
受影响的总人数: 数字未知
外劳和移民工人: ( 数字未知 - 地点未知 , 农业和畜牧 , Men , Unknown migration status )议题
Precarious/Unsuitable Living Conditions , Reasonable Working Hours & Leisure Time , Harassment (other than sexual) , 殴打和暴力 , 恐吓和威胁 , Dismissal , Access to Non-Judicial Remedy回应
已邀请回应:是,由The Resource Centre
载有回应的故事: (查看更多)
后续行动: None reported. The Resource Centre asked Hannaford and its parent company Ahold Delhazie to respond to the allegations. Their response can be read in full.
信息来源: News outlet
摘要
日期: 2023年6月21日
地点: 美国
企业
Ahold Delhaize - Other Value Chain Entity , Hannaford (part of Ahold Delhaize) - Buyer其他
Not Reported ( 农业和畜牧 ) - Employer受影响的
受影响的总人数: 数字未知
外劳和移民工人: ( 数字未知 - 地点未知 , 农业和畜牧 , Gender not reported , Unknown migration status )议题
Precarious/Unsuitable Living Conditions , 隐私 , 恐吓和威胁 , 剥夺言论自由 , Occupational Health & Safety , 种族/民族/阶层/出身歧视回应
已邀请回应:是,由The Resource Centre
载有回应的故事: (查看更多)
后续行动: None reported. The Resource Centre asked Hannaford and its parent company Ahold Delhazie to respond to the allegations. Their response can be read in full.
信息来源: News outlet
摘要
日期: 2023年6月21日
地点: 美国
企业
Hannaford (part of Ahold Delhaize) - Buyer , Ahold Delhaize - Other Value Chain Entity受影响的
受影响的总人数: 数字未知
外劳和移民工人: ( 数字未知 - 地点未知 , 农业和畜牧 , Gender not reported , Unknown migration status )议题
Occupational Health & Safety , 种族/民族/阶层/出身歧视 , Precarious/Unsuitable Living Conditions , Access to Non-Judicial Remedy , 恐吓和威胁回应
已邀请回应:是,由The Resource Centre
载有回应的故事: (查看更多)
后续行动: None reported. The Resource Centre asked Hannaford and its parent company Ahold Delhazie to respond to the allegations. Their response can be read in full.
信息来源: News outlet
For years, farmworkers have called on Hannaford Supermarkets to take responsibility for the rights and well-being of the workers behind Hannaford-brand milk by joining the Milk with Dignity Program. Hannaford has responded that participation in Milk with Dignity is unnecessary, because the company’s “Standards of Engagement” sufficiently protect workers’ rights. The centerpiece of that claim is Hannaford’s “Speak-Up Line:” following years of farmworkers denouncing deplorable conditions, the supermarket chain launched a hotline for workers in its supply chain.
Over the past year, farmworkers have put Hannaford’s “Speak-Up Line” to the test. Workers on ten farms submitted complaints about abuse and mistreatment. What has their experience shown? On every front, Hannaford’s system has failed to protect farmworker rights.
Farmworkers’ experiences reveal Hannaford’s “Speak-Up Line” as a poor imitation of Milk with Dignity. It lacks the accessibility that makes Milk with Dignity an effective program to protect workers’ rights. The “investigations” conducted in response to workers’ complaints are grossly inadequate and biased, in contrast to Milk with Dignity’s speedy, thorough, and professional investigations. Hannaford has not provided remediation to a single worker’s complaint, as opposed to the hundreds of complaints resulting in remediation on Milk with Dignity farms.
These failures mean that Hannaford has been unable to provide enforceable protections for farmworkers: its much-touted “Standards of Engagement” are meaningless to the workers whose rights are violated daily. Meanwhile, the protections guaranteed by Milk with Dignity are well-documented and incontrovertible.
[...]