abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

这页面没有简体中文版本,现以English显示

非政府组织回答

2023年2月28日

作者:
IndustriALL & industriAll European Trade Union

IndustriALL rejoinder to POSCO Assan’s reply to BHRRC dated July 2022

IndustriALL Global Union and industriAll European Trade Union, both representing workers in mining, energy, and manufacturing industries throughout the world, wish to contest POSCO Assan’s reply to BHRRC dated July 2022, which does not reflect reality and misleads the public and investors regarding human rights violations at its Kocaeli plant...

In their most recent reply to BHRRC in June 2022, POSCO Assan says that: “As a result of the lawsuits filed by the workers who were dismissed due to indiscipline, a decision was made to reemploy the workers and to pay compensation to the workers if they were not hired. As there is an elective right of employer according to law; Posco Assan TST chose to pay all of the compensations included in the court decision when the court decisions

became final.”

This is not true, as it can easily be shown by the court decisions, initially at the court of first instance, which were challenged and upheld by the Regional Court of Appeals and later by the highest court, the Supreme Court...

In these decisions, the court clearly states that POSCO dismissed the workers due to their union activity and obliges POSCO to pay 12 months extra salary in addition to their severance pay, which is not mentioned in POSCO’s reply regarding these dismissal cases. The judges’ wording is very clear on this: they outline that article 25 of the Law on Trade Unions and Collective Bargaining No. 6356 regarding freedom of association has been violated and as a penalty for this violation of union rights, the company must pay an additional 12 months’ salary without any conditions.

Along with serious violations of individual workers’ rights, the company management also violates the collective rights of workers, particularly freedom of association and the right to collective bargaining, by denying that Birleşik Metal İş is legally the representative union, despite clear rulings by the court.

The local court ruled in favour of Birleşik Metal-İş, and the Court of Appeal confirmed the ruling. As a final step, the company took the matter to the Court of Cassation. The final court, the Court of Cassation, decided that Birleşik Metal İş is the representative union in the workplace...

[full response attached]

时间线

隐私资讯

本网站使用 cookie 和其他网络存储技术。您可以在下方设置您的隐私选项。您所作的更改将立即生效。

有关我们使用网络存储的更多信息,请参阅我们的 数据使用和 Cookie 政策

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

分析 cookie

ON
OFF

您浏览本网页时我们将以Google Analytics收集信息。接受此cookie将有助我们理解您的浏览资讯,并协助我们改善呈现资讯的方法。所有分析资讯都以匿名方式收集,我们并不能用相关资讯得到您的个人信息。谷歌在所有主要浏览器中都提供退出Google Analytics的添加应用程式。

市场营销cookies

ON
OFF

我们从第三方网站获得企业责任资讯,当中包括社交媒体和搜寻引擎。这些cookie协助我们理解相关浏览数据。

您在此网站上的隐私选项

本网站使用cookie和其他网络存储技术来增强您在必要核心功能之外的体验。