abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

这页面没有简体中文版本,现以English显示

法律诉讼

2012年5月10日

作者:
Business & Human Rights Resource Centre

Kenya Pipeline Company lawsuit (re explosion & fire in Nairobi)

状态: ONGOING

提诉日期
2012年5月10日
未知
小区
申诉地点: 肯尼亚
事发地点: 肯尼亚
诉讼类型: Domestic

企业

Kenya Pipeline Company 肯尼亚 油、气、煤

Sources

Snapshot: In 2012, more than 300 victims of an oil spill in the slum of Mukuru-Sinai, Nairobi, filed a lawsuit against Kenya Pipeline Company, among others. They allege the defendants acted negligently in constructing the oil pipeline in the middle of the slum and failed to uphold their duty of care. Defendants allege they do not bear direct responsibility for the damage. Proceedings are ongoing. 

On 12 September 2011, a spillage occurred from a pipeline owned by Kenya Pipeline Company, running through the slum of Mukuru-Sinai, in an industrial area of Nairobi.  As slum dwellers went to collect the fuel that was spilling, the pipeline exploded.  A fire broke out in the Sinai area. The explosion and the fire together killed about 120 people and injured hundreds.

In May 2012, more than 300 victims brought a lawsuit against, among others, Kenya Pipeline Company, Kenya Power and Lighting Company, the City Council of Nairobi, and the National Environment Management Authority.  They claim that the defendants acted negligently in constructing an oil pipeline in the middle of the slum, without putting adequate fire equipment in place, and failed to uphold their statutory duties.  The plaintiffs are seeking over KSh25 billion (worth about US$300 million at the time) in compensation.  The defendants argue that they do not bear direct responsibility for the fire and that the victims have failed to show the defendants have breached their duties under the law.  They asked to be removed from the lawsuit and made an application to the High Court in this regard in November 2012.  In February 2014, hearings commenced in the High Court and the first witnesses testified.  

High Court Judge David Majanja, who presided over the case from the start, approved out-of-court discussions involving the Government, Nairobi Senator Mike Sonko, Kenya Pipeline, the National Environmental Management Authority, and the victims. Yet, Judge Lenoala, who subsequently presided the case, learned that with Kenya Pipeline having withdrawn from the negotiations, the Government expressed concerns that an agreement on payments might not be reached.

The High Court has rejected to award 25 billion shillings sought by the plaintiffs. Instead, the court instructed them to file a proper suit for damages specifically addressing personal injury claims. Furthermore, the court ruled that claimants are obligated to file a negligence suit for the recovery of damages. In this process, each claimant must demonstrate their individual losses and establish liability based on breach of duty, causation, and damages. Nairobi Senator, Gideon Mbuvi intends to appeal the High Court decision.

-"Sonko To Appeal Case Where Court Declined To Compensate Sinai Fire Survivors", Dzuya Walter, Citizen Digital, 8 Feb 2017

-"Sinai Fire Victims Denied SH25 Billion by Court", Sam Alfan, Nairobi Times, 6 Feb 2017

-"Blow To Sinai Fire Victims As Court Declines To Award Them Compensation", Dzuya Walter, Citizen Digital, 6 Feb 2017

-"Kenya Pipeline Corporation pulls out of talks with fire victims", Kurian Musa, the Standard, 2014

- “Nairobi Senator Sonko finally testifies in Sinai fire tragedy case”, Kurian Musa, Standard Media (Kenya), 14 Feb 2014
- “State negligence caused Sinai tragedy, court told”, Vincent Agoya, Daily Nation (Kenya), 13 Feb 2014
- “Sinai slum fire victims anxious over delay in compensation hearing”, Vincent Agoya, Daily Nation (Kenya), 23 Oct 2013
- “City council wants out of Sinai suit”, Alphonce Mungahu, Star (Kenya), 6 Nov 2012
-  “Three seek to be excluded from Sh25bn Sinai fire case”, Daily Nation (Kenya), 5 Nov 2012
- “Sonko has 300 Sinai fire witnesses in Sh25 billion suit”, Alphonce Mungahu, Star (Kenya), 3 Nov 2012
- “Victims of Sinai fire seek compensation”, Isaiah Lucheli, Standard Digital (Kenya), 10 May 2012
- “What government and KPC should do to avert future tragedies in the wake of Mukuru-Sinai slum disaster”, Wambui Kimathi & Louiza Kabiru, Kenya National Commission on Human Rights, in Business Daily (Kenya),16 Sept 2011
- Kenya Pipeline Company: Press statement, 12 Sep 2011

时间线

隐私资讯

本网站使用 cookie 和其他网络存储技术。您可以在下方设置您的隐私选项。您所作的更改将立即生效。

有关我们使用网络存储的更多信息,请参阅我们的 数据使用和 Cookie 政策

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

分析 cookie

ON
OFF

您浏览本网页时我们将以Google Analytics收集信息。接受此cookie将有助我们理解您的浏览资讯,并协助我们改善呈现资讯的方法。所有分析资讯都以匿名方式收集,我们并不能用相关资讯得到您的个人信息。谷歌在所有主要浏览器中都提供退出Google Analytics的添加应用程式。

市场营销cookies

ON
OFF

我们从第三方网站获得企业责任资讯,当中包括社交媒体和搜寻引擎。这些cookie协助我们理解相关浏览数据。

您在此网站上的隐私选项

本网站使用cookie和其他网络存储技术来增强您在必要核心功能之外的体验。