abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

这页面没有简体中文版本,现以English显示

内容有以下的语言版本: English, español, français

法律诉讼

2016年11月15日

Lafarge lawsuit (re complicity in crimes against humanity in Syria)

状态: ONGOING

提诉日期
2016年11月15日
未知
工人
申诉地点: 法国
事发地点: 叙利亚
诉讼类型: 跨国

企业

Holcim (part of LafargeHolcim) 瑞士 建材和设备
Lafarge (part of LafargeHolcim) 瑞士 建材和设备
LafargeHolcim 瑞士 建材和设备

Sources

Snapshot: In 2016, 11 former Syrian employees and two NGOs filed a criminal complaint before French courts against Lafarge, a cement company, for alleged abuses committed in Syria by its subsidiary such as buying raw material from diverse jihadists groups to maintain its business activities in Syria in the midst of the Syrian Civil War and compensating these groups for safe passage of workers and products. Lafarge is charged with complicity in war crimes, crimes against humanity, financing of a terrorist enterprise, and forced labour. The lawsuit is ongoing.

In November 2016, 11 former Syrian employees and two NGOs (Sherpa and the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights’ (ECCHR)) filed a criminal complaint before French courts against the cement company, Lafarge, for alleged abuses committed in Syria by its subsidiary Lafarge Cement Syria (LCS).

Lafarge is charged for complicity in war crimes, crimes against humanity, financing of a terrorist enterprise, deliberate endangerment of people's lives and forced labour. These charges are based on facts occurring between 2011 and 2014 when Lafarge decided to maintain its business activities in Syria in the midst of the Syrian Civil War. In order to do so, the company allegedly bought raw material from diverse jihadists groups, among which ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant), and allegedly negotiated safe passage of its workers and products in exchange for compensations amounting to 13 million euros. 

In 2015, Lafarge merged with Holcim. Lafarge-Holcim immediately announced that its subsidiary Lafarge SA would appeal in an effort to challenge "offenses that do not fairly reflect (its) responsibilities. "The plaintiffs are now demanding the opening of a compensation fund for all former employees of LCS and their families. In October 2018, the investigative magistrates seized part of Lafarge ex-executives’ severance payments, about 2.475 million euros.

In June 2017, the Paris Public Prosecutor opened an investigation for financing terrorism. On 28 June 2018, Lafarge was indicted by French investigative judges for complicity in crimes against humanity. It named as defendants the group Lafarge itself (98% shareholder of LCS), its Syrian subsidiary, two senior executives at the time (Bruno Lafont, and Bruno Pescheux) and its current CEO (Frédéric Jolibois).

In October 2019, the Paris appeals court dismissed the request of the two NGOs to be civil parties in the case. On 7 November 2019, a French appeal court dropped the crimes against humanity charges against the company. Sherpa and ECCHR appealed to the Supreme Court.

On 8 June 2021, the Supreme Court examined the case, in particular the dismissal of the crimes against humanity charges against Lafarge-Holcim and the admissibility of the two NGOs as plaintiffs.

On 7 September 2021, the French Supreme Court overturned the 2019 lower court decision that dismissed charges against Lafarge for complicity in crimes against humanity and the charges over endangering the lives of others . It asked the investigating magistrates to reconsider these charges.

On 18 May 2022, the Investigative Chamber of the Paris Court of Appeals reinstated the charge of "complicity in crimes against humanity" against Lafarge. The company is also charged with financing terrorism and endangering the lives of others. Holcim declared that it disagreed with the decision and will appeal to the French Supreme Court.

On 26 June 2023, French judges closed the investigation into Lafarge's activities relating to the financing of terrorism charge. Other allegations such as complicity in crimes against humanity and endangering the lives of others, remain under investigation.

On 16 January 2024, the French Supreme Court rejected Lafarge's request to dismiss charges and ruled that Lafarge can be charged with complicity in crimes against humanity for its activities in Syria. However, the Supreme Court accepted Lafarge's argument that it could not be prosecuted for endangering the lives of staff based on French labour law, as that law did not apply to local staff. The ruling is procedural, with the determination of substance and guilt yet to be established.

On 9 February 2024, French prosecutors recommended that Lafarge and nine of its former managers stand trial on charges of terrorism financing. This request is based on violations of international embargoes prohibiting financial support to terrorist entities such as the Islamic State (IS) and Al-Nusra Front.

On 16 October 2024, French investigating judges ordered Lafarge and four former executives to face trial in a French criminal court for financing a terrorist organisation and violating an embargo.

- "French judges order trial of Lafarge over terror financing at plant in Syria", RFI, 17 Oct 2024

- "French prosecutors seek Lafarge trial for terror financing", AFP, 9 Feb 2024

- "Lafarge can be charged with 'complicity in crimes against humanity', French court says", Reuters, 16 Jan 2024

-France: Judges close the investigation into Lafarge's activities relating to the financing of terrorism charge, AFP, 26 June 2023

- French court upholds Syria 'complicity in crimes against humanity' charge against Lafarge, AFP, 18 May 2022

-France's Lafarge loses ruling in Syria 'crimes against humanity' case, AFP, 7 Sep 2021

- "French Court Investigates Lafarge’s Links to Terrorism in Syria", Asharq Al-Awsat, 7 Jun 2021

-"France's Lafarge has charge of crimes against humanity lifted: lawyers", Reuters, 7 Nov 2019
- “LafargeHolcim’s French unit under formal investigation over Syria activities”, Financial Times, 28 Jun 2018
- "Lafarge paid 13 million euros to armed groups to keep operating in Syria, rights group say", Emmanuelle Jarry, Reuters, 12 Dec 2017
- “France launches judicial inquiry into activities of Lafarge over allegations of financing terrorist enterprise & endangering lives in Syria", Reuters, 13 Jun 2017
- “LafargeHolcim's CEO resigns following evidence of the company's indirect financing of armed groups in Syria”, AFP, 16 May 2017
- “Lafarge Scandal Points to Difficulty for Businesses in War Zones”, New York Times, 24 Apr 2017

Lafarge/Holcim:

-Group statement following court decision of Lafarge on 18 May 2022, Paris, France

- LafargeHolcim concludes independent investigation into legacy Syria operations and issues summary of investigation findings, 24 Apr 2017

ECCHR and Sherpa:

- "Multinational Lafarge and four former executives to stand trial for financing of terrorism in Syria", Sherpa and ECCHR, 16 Oct 2024

-Charges Confirmed against Lafarge for Complicity in Crimes against Humanity in Syria, 18 May 2022

-“Can the Lafarge case be a game changer? French multinational company indicted for international crimes in Syria”, 31 Aug 2018

- “Landmark Decision in Lafarge Case”, 28 Jun 2018

- Sherpa and ECCHR to appeal decision in Lafarge/Syria case at French Supreme Court, 7 Nov 2019
- "Submission from SHERPA and ECCHR on an indictment of Lafarge for complicity in crimes against humanity", 15 May 2018 
- “Important step in the « Lafarge in Syria » case: Nomination of three investigative judges”, 13 Jun 2017
- “Lafarge in Syria: the conclusion of their internal report admitted the implication of the parent company”, 24 Apr 2017

时间线

隐私资讯

本网站使用 cookie 和其他网络存储技术。您可以在下方设置您的隐私选项。您所作的更改将立即生效。

有关我们使用网络存储的更多信息,请参阅我们的 数据使用和 Cookie 政策

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

分析 cookie

ON
OFF

您浏览本网页时我们将以Google Analytics收集信息。接受此cookie将有助我们理解您的浏览资讯,并协助我们改善呈现资讯的方法。所有分析资讯都以匿名方式收集,我们并不能用相关资讯得到您的个人信息。谷歌在所有主要浏览器中都提供退出Google Analytics的添加应用程式。

市场营销cookies

ON
OFF

我们从第三方网站获得企业责任资讯,当中包括社交媒体和搜寻引擎。这些cookie协助我们理解相关浏览数据。

您在此网站上的隐私选项

本网站使用cookie和其他网络存储技术来增强您在必要核心功能之外的体验。