abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

这页面没有简体中文版本,现以English显示

内容有以下的语言版本: English, 日本語

文章

2024年1月26日

作者:
Michael Sainato, Guardian (UK)

USA: large companies increasingly use lawsuits as tactics to prevent and dissuade workers to unionise, say experts

Barista at Starbucks

"‘Dark forces’: how US corporations turned to courts in fight against unions" 26 jan 2024

...A multi-pronged legal attack under way by Elon Musk, large corporations, business groups and anti-union litigators threatens to “raise havoc” with US labor law and hobble a resurgent labor movement, according to experts.

So far efforts to scale back or undermine workers’ rights through the US courts have centered on the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) – the US top workplace watchdog and overseer of union elections. But other laws – including trademark and property rights statutes – are also being used.

Both Musk and Starbucks are pursuing cases that would undermine the NLRB.

Musk’s company SpaceX filed a lawsuit championed by the Federalist Society and other conservative groups against the NLRB in January. The lawsuit claims the board is unconstitutional because its members can only be removed for cause, not at will, and claims the board violates due process protections. The suit was filed in Texas...in response to a board complaint that SpaceX fired workers in retaliation for writing a letter over concerns about Musk’s behavior...

Starbucks is challenging the NLRB’s ruling that the world’s largest coffee chain must rehire seven fired union activists in Memphis, Tennessee. The board won an injunction ordering Starbucks to reinstate the workers with backpay and a lower court ruled the firings probably discouraged other employees from exercising their rights under US labor law...

The US supreme court will now hear the case, which centers on whether the NLRB has the right to ask courts to reinstate workers while litigation is ongoing – referred to as 10(j) injunctions. Unfair dismissal cases can take years to hear and the agency – which asked the supreme court not to take the case – has argued removing the power will have a chilling effect on union organizing.

Starbucks praised the decision...

But it is not just the watchdog that is under attack. Starbucks also filed a lawsuit late last year against Starbucks Workers United, alleging trademark infringement. Trader Joe’s filed a similar lawsuit against the union Trader Joe’s United, which a judge in California recently threw out. Medieval Times also filed a lawsuit against its workers’ union, claiming trademark infringement, which was also thrown out by a judge.

Seth Goldstein, a labor attorney representing Trader Joe’s United, said the trademark suits were part of an “emerging toolbox” of anti-union law firms “where they are really using everything they have to try to stop the new organizing movement”...

Cathy Creighton, director of Cornell University’s Industrial and Labor Relations Buffalo Co-Lab and a former NLRB field attorney, said corporations have long used a number of tactics to prevent and dissuade their workers from organizing unions...

“They’re trying to kill the movement. Corporate America is going full bore after the labor movement and that’s what they’re trying to do is to really annihilate them on every level that they can, including these legal maneuvers,” said Creighton...

Another increasingly popular tactic has been to argue that property rights supersede the rights of workers in workplaces, said David Muraskin, managing director for litigation at the legal advocacy group FarmStand...

隐私资讯

本网站使用 cookie 和其他网络存储技术。您可以在下方设置您的隐私选项。您所作的更改将立即生效。

有关我们使用网络存储的更多信息,请参阅我们的 数据使用和 Cookie 政策

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

分析 cookie

ON
OFF

您浏览本网页时我们将以Google Analytics收集信息。接受此cookie将有助我们理解您的浏览资讯,并协助我们改善呈现资讯的方法。所有分析资讯都以匿名方式收集,我们并不能用相关资讯得到您的个人信息。谷歌在所有主要浏览器中都提供退出Google Analytics的添加应用程式。

市场营销cookies

ON
OFF

我们从第三方网站获得企业责任资讯,当中包括社交媒体和搜寻引擎。这些cookie协助我们理解相关浏览数据。

您在此网站上的隐私选项

本网站使用cookie和其他网络存储技术来增强您在必要核心功能之外的体验。